First time here? Checkout the FAQ!
+2 votes

asked in Mathematical Logic by Loyal (4.7k points)   | 45 views

1 Answer

+2 votes
Best answer

1. $( (p \implies q) \wedge (r \implies s) \wedge (p \vee q) ) \implies (q \vee s)$

This implication is false if LHS is true and RHS is false and true otherwise.

Let's assume RHS to be false. i.e. $ (q \vee s) $ is False. So, q = False and s = False. Put these values of False for q and s in LHS.

So LHS becomes: $( (p \implies False ) \wedge (r \implies False) \wedge (p \vee False) ) = (\neg p \vee False) \wedge ( \neg r \vee False) \wedge (p \vee False) = \neg p \wedge \neg r \wedge p = False$

So we've proven that when RHS is false then LHS is also false. So the whole implication is always true and hence valid.

Similarly for 2nd if we assume RHS to be false, then it means p = true and r = true. Now substitute these values in LHS:

$( (p \implies q ) \wedge (r \implies s) \wedge ( \neg q \vee \neg s) ) = (\neg p \vee q) \wedge ( \neg r \vee s) \wedge (\neg q \vee \neg s) = ( false \vee q) \wedge (false \vee s) \wedge ( \neg q \vee \neg s) = q \wedge s \wedge (\neg q \vee \neg s) = ( q \wedge s) \wedge \neg(q \wedge s) = false$

In 2nd case also we've proved that if RHS is False then LHS has to be false. So the implication holds and is valid.

3rd one is true by Hypothetical Syllogism (also known as "the principle of transitivity of implication")

So 1, 2, 3 are all valid.

answered by Loyal (3.3k points)  
selected by
wonderfully explained..thanks..:)
Top Users Feb 2017
  1. Arjun

    5288 Points

  2. Bikram

    4230 Points

  3. Habibkhan

    3952 Points

  4. Aboveallplayer

    3086 Points

  5. Debashish Deka

    2378 Points

  6. sriv_shubham

    2308 Points

  7. Smriti012

    2236 Points

  8. Arnabi

    2008 Points

  9. mcjoshi

    1690 Points

  10. sh!va

    1684 Points

Monthly Topper: Rs. 500 gift card

20,860 questions
26,010 answers
22,113 users