GATE CSE
First time here? Checkout the FAQ!
x
0 votes
46 views

Ans given: 100

asked ago in Databases by Boss (5.1k points)   | 46 views

1 Answer

0 votes
Best answer

Lets take an example, Below are three instances of table with ratio of tuples equal to the original relation.

A B C
 Y  Y  L
 P  Q  M
 C  D  N
 X  Z  O

 

C D E
 L  Z  A
 M  Z  A
 N  Z  A
 L  Z  B
 M  Z  B
 O  Z  B

 

E F
 A  Z
 B  Z

If we join tem in any way the resulting table will have 6 tuples 
We can thus conclude that P join Q join R will result in 300 tuples.

A B C D E F
 Y  Y  L  Z  A  Z
 Y  Y  L  Z  B  Z
 P  Q  M  Z  A  Z
 P  Q  M  Z  B  Z
 C  D  N  Z  A  Z
 X  Z  O  Z  B  Z

 

answered ago by Active (2.1k points)  
selected ago by
NO...if we join Q(CE) and R(E) then we can get 300 tuples.

Then with P....300 should be answer.
Suppose CE attributes have tuples as:

ab

ac

bb

bc

And EF attributes have tuples as:

bg

ct

Then the join of these results in tuples

abg

act

bct

bbg

Here we're getting the tuples from relation having maximum tuples. Correct me if I'm wrong @Rakesh
Thanks guys for correcting me, updated the answer with an example.
All credits to vaishali :)

Ths is wrongly framed question. They havent stated maximum or minimum.

If minumum, then its 0.

If maximum, then 300 tuples

^ how min = 0 ??

If one of C or E for all touple of relation Q is null ??
Consider the tables here:

 

               Table P

-------------------------------------------------

A          B       C

------------------------------------------------

1         1         1

2         2         2

.

.

200    200      200

 

          Table Q

------------------------------------

C            D              E

-------------------------------------

201         201            201

202         202            202

.

.

500         500            500

 

 

              Table R

------------------------------------------------

E                    F

------------------------------------------------

501              501

502              502

.

.

600              600
..........
@Vijay. I dont think that for relation Q, one of C or E can be null.
I thought, C in Q is foreign key pointng to C in P and similarly E in Q referring to E in R.

So, we should not consider foreign key even if there is common attribute between two relation unless it is mentioned explicitly. ??
@Vijay. Yes. We shouldn't consider unless explicitly stated because we have satisfied the conditions they have given.
But, if options are given, we need to consider that C is foreign key in Q   :P
....
Top Users Jan 2017
  1. Debashish Deka

    7050 Points

  2. Habibkhan

    4674 Points

  3. Vijay Thakur

    4224 Points

  4. saurabh rai

    4008 Points

  5. sudsho

    3960 Points

  6. Arjun

    3108 Points

  7. GateSet

    3088 Points

  8. santhoshdevulapally

    3004 Points

  9. Bikram

    2976 Points

  10. Sushant Gokhale

    2744 Points

Monthly Topper: Rs. 500 gift card

18,810 questions
23,779 answers
51,413 comments
20,128 users