edited by
506 views
1 votes
1 votes

edited by

1 Answer

Best answer
3 votes
3 votes

Ans:(B) NO

Explanation:

Since AB  determine all the attributes of the Relation R(A,B,C,D) , AB is called Key.

As  AB is the minimal Key it can be called as Candidate key (or primarykey)

Intailly the decomposed relations be R1(A,C,D), R2(B,C)

Now from R1(ACD) the Functional Dependencies determined are C - >A, C - >D 

and From R2(BC) no functional dependencies are possible

now to test whether AB ->C is in the  functional dependencies of (R1 U R2)  compute {AB}+

(AB)+={A,B} 

As (AB)+ doesn't contains C, the decomposition is not dependendency preserving.

Hope this makes you clear, Thanks for your question :)

selected by

Related questions

2 votes
2 votes
2 answers
1
Arnab Bhadra asked May 30, 2017
1,190 views
Find what FD is violated by the Relation R = { } i.e. empty relationa. All FDb. Does not violate FD'sc. Cannot sayd. None of the Above
4 votes
4 votes
1 answer
3
naveen bhatt asked Dec 7, 2018
1,434 views
Consider the relation R(A,B,C,D,E) with the functional dependencies :A → B, B → C, C → A, D → E, and E → DThe Maximum possible super-keys of R is ______________...