1 votes 1 votes 1-In self referential relation we alwasy need 1 table. 2-If there is a total participation of one entity with the relation,we can can merge E1,the relation and E2 into a single table. Which of the above given statements are true? Databases databases er-diagram + – Gate Madrista asked Jan 23, 2017 • retagged Jun 4, 2017 by Arjun Gate Madrista 463 views answer comment Share Follow See all 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.
0 votes 0 votes In self referential relation we always need 1 table. False statement , for m:n we need 2 tables. If there is a total participation of one entity with the relation,we can can merge E1,the relation and E2 into a single table. yes , True , total participation with 1:1 with one side / both sides of a relation gives 1 table . Bikram answered Jul 15, 2017 Bikram comment Share Follow See all 5 Comments See all 5 5 Comments reply Show 2 previous comments Shubhanshu commented Sep 4, 2017 reply Follow Share Sir, https://gateoverflow.in/123659/self-doubt, in @Sachin Mittal 1 answer's:- 1.Only Partial participations- One-One:2 Tables, Merge Relation to any of the side. Many-One or One-Many:2 Tables, Merge Relation to Many side. Many-Many:3 tables (separate table for relation) 2. Any one of the side has full participation- Full participation on Many Side: 2 Tables Full Participation on one side: 1 Table 3.Both Side full participation- Always one table irrespective of Cardinality But diff data in Selected answer which one is true sir?? 0 votes 0 votes Bikram commented Sep 4, 2017 reply Follow Share Full participation on Many Side: 2 Tables and in best ans it is 3 written that your concern right ? 0 votes 0 votes Shubhanshu commented Sep 4, 2017 reply Follow Share In @Sachin Mittal 1 answer's, for total participation at both side in M:N it is 1 table, But in the selected answer it is 3 tables either max or min but 3 tables,\. 0 votes 0 votes Please log in or register to add a comment.