edited by
1,673 views
2 votes
2 votes

Sourya committee had proposed the establishment of Sourya Institutes of Technology (SITs) in line with Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) to cater to the technological and industrial needs of a developing country.

Which of the following can be logically inferred from the above sentence?

Based on the proposal,

  1. In the initial years, SIT students will get degrees from IIT.
  2. SITs will have a distinct national objective.
  3. SIT like institutions can only be established in consultation with IIT.
  4. SITs will serve technological needs of a developing country.
  1. (iii) and (iv) only.
  2. (i) and (iv) only.
  3. (ii) and (iv) only.
  4. (ii) and (iii) only.
edited by

2 Answers

Best answer
4 votes
4 votes
Statement (i) - nothing is mentioned in the passage from where SIT students will get degree. So, it is wrong statement.

Statement (ii) - " to cater to the technological and industrial needs of a developing country." this line supports statement (ii). It means Sourya has distinct national objectives.

Statement (iii) - Nothing is mention about consultation with IIT so this makes statement (iii) false.

Statement (iv) - Again this statement "to cater to the technological and industrial needs of a developing country." directly supports statement (iv).

So, only statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. Option C correct .
1 votes
1 votes

Option C.

Only II and IV can be inferred. Nothing is said about degrees or collaboration with IITs. 

Answer:

Related questions

4 votes
4 votes
3 answers
4
makhdoom ghaya asked Jan 25, 2017
1,219 views
Pick the odd one out in the following:$13, 23, 33, 43, 53$$23$$33$ $43$ $53$