GATE CSE
First time here? Checkout the FAQ!
x
+2 votes
424 views

Which of the following is TRUE?

  1. The cost of searching an AVL tree is θ (log n) but that of a binary search tree is O(n)
  2. The cost of searching an AVL tree is θ (log n) but that of a complete binary tree is θ (n log n)
  3. The cost of searching a binary search tree is O (log n ) but that of an AVL tree is θ(n)
  4. The cost of searching an AVL tree is θ (n log n) but that of a binary search tree is O(n)
asked in DS by Veteran (19.4k points)  
retagged by | 424 views

2 Answers

+10 votes
Best answer
A) is true as AVL tree is a balanced search tree that has time complexity of searching $\Theta ( \log n)$, but in binary search tree, we can have a completely left/right skewed tree, in which search is $O(n)$.
answered by Veteran (10.7k points)  
selected by
In an AVL tree sometimes search can succeed in first or second try. So, it should be $O(\log n)$ and not $\Theta(\log n)$ rt?

if we find the maximum height with minimum no of nodes then the height H = n/2 , without violating the property of the AVL tree . Then the cost of searching  in AVL tree could be O(n/2) . Not always necessary to be Log(n) . 

 
   

 

0 votes
option A is right
answered by Active (1.3k points)  


Top Users Jul 2017
  1. Bikram

    3782 Points

  2. manu00x

    2464 Points

  3. Debashish Deka

    1832 Points

  4. joshi_nitish

    1494 Points

  5. Arnab Bhadra

    1096 Points

  6. Arjun

    1054 Points

  7. Hemant Parihar

    1050 Points

  8. Shubhanshu

    972 Points

  9. Ahwan

    876 Points

  10. akash.dinkar12

    642 Points


23,953 questions
30,895 answers
70,108 comments
29,272 users