First time here? Checkout the FAQ!
0 votes
1. What is good for corporations is good for the United States.

2. What is good for the United States is good for you.

3. What is good for the corporations is for you to buy lots of stuffs


What are the valid conclusions? Please explain the solution
asked in Mathematical Logic by Boss (5.9k points)   | 64 views

1 Answer

0 votes

The first two conditional statements can be phrased as

"If x is good for corporations, then x is good for the U.S." and "If x is good for the U.S., then x is good for you."

If we now apply universal instantiation with x being "for you to buy lots of stuff,'' then we can conclude using modus ponens twice that for you to buy lots of stuff is good for the U.S. and is good for you.

Universal instantiation : is the rule of inference used to conclude that P(c) is true, where c
is a particular member of the domain, given the premise ∀xP(x). Universal instantiation is used
when we conclude from the statement “All women are wise” that “Lisa is wise,” where Lisa is
a member of the domain of all women.


answered by Loyal (2.9k points)  

Top Users Jul 2017
  1. Bikram

    4386 Points

  2. manu00x

    2464 Points

  3. Debashish Deka

    1850 Points

  4. joshi_nitish

    1686 Points

  5. Arjun

    1340 Points

  6. Hemant Parihar

    1184 Points

  7. Arnab Bhadra

    1112 Points

  8. Shubhanshu

    1080 Points

  9. Ahwan

    900 Points

  10. rahul sharma 5

    732 Points

24,031 questions
30,983 answers
29,358 users