First time here? Checkout the FAQ!
0 votes
1. What is good for corporations is good for the United States.

2. What is good for the United States is good for you.

3. What is good for the corporations is for you to buy lots of stuffs


What are the valid conclusions? Please explain the solution
asked in Mathematical Logic by Veteran (11.4k points)   | 67 views

1 Answer

+1 vote

The first two conditional statements can be phrased as

"If x is good for corporations, then x is good for the U.S." and "If x is good for the U.S., then x is good for you."

If we now apply universal instantiation with x being "for you to buy lots of stuff,'' then we can conclude using modus ponens twice that for you to buy lots of stuff is good for the U.S. and is good for you.

Universal instantiation : is the rule of inference used to conclude that P(c) is true, where c
is a particular member of the domain, given the premise ∀xP(x). Universal instantiation is used
when we conclude from the statement “All women are wise” that “Lisa is wise,” where Lisa is
a member of the domain of all women.


answered by Loyal (4.5k points)  

Top Users Sep 2017
  1. Habibkhan

    8796 Points

  2. rishu_darkshadow

    3572 Points

  3. Warrior

    2914 Points

  4. Arjun

    2840 Points

  5. A_i_$_h

    2550 Points

  6. manu00x

    2268 Points

  7. nikunj

    1990 Points

  8. Bikram

    1874 Points

  9. makhdoom ghaya

    1820 Points

  10. SiddharthMahapatra

    1718 Points

26,346 questions
33,927 answers
31,231 users