Login
Register
Dark Mode
Brightness
Profile
Edit Profile
Messages
My favorites
My Updates
Logout
Search results for reduction
0
votes
0
answers
1
Hopcroft, Ullman Theorem 9.7 Reductions
There exists a language Ld = {M | M doesn't belong to L(M)}. Ld is the collection of Turing machines (programs) M such that M does not halt and accept when given itself as input. It is known and proved that Ld is a non- ... and Ld is non-RE, ATM must be non-RE. But we know that ATM is Recursively Enumerable and undecidable. How is this possible?
There exists a language Ld = {M | M doesn't belong to L(M)}. Ld is the collection of Turing machines (programs) M such that M does not halt and accept when given itself a...
dopq12
93
views
dopq12
asked
Mar 5
Theory of Computation
decidability
theory-of-computation
turing-machine
reduction
recursive-and-recursively-enumerable-languages
+
–
47
votes
5
answers
2
GATE CSE 2016 Set 1 | Question: 44
Let $X$ be a recursive language and $Y$ be a recursively enumerable but not recursive language. Let $W$ and $Z$ be two languages such that $\overline{Y}$ reduces to $W$, and $Z$ reduces to $\overline{X}$ (reduction means the standard ... enumerable. $W$ is not recursively enumerable and $Z$ is recursive. $W$ is not recursively enumerable and $Z$ is not recursive.
Let $X$ be a recursive language and $Y$ be a recursively enumerable but not recursive language. Let $W$ and $Z$ be two languages such that $\overline{Y}$ reduces to $W$,...
Sandeep Singh
12.4k
views
Sandeep Singh
asked
Feb 12, 2016
Theory of Computation
gatecse-2016-set1
theory-of-computation
easy
recursive-and-recursively-enumerable-languages
reduction
+
–
2
votes
1
answer
3
#TOC NPTEL ASSIGNMENT Question about reducibility
Please help me understand this question. I have searched on internet, but not avail. Click this to see the question
Please help me understand this question. I have searched on internet, but not avail. Click this to see the question
iarnav
468
views
iarnav
asked
Sep 6, 2021
Theory of Computation
theory-of-computation
reduction
+
–
52
votes
3
answers
4
GATE CSE 2005 | Question: 45
Consider three decision problems $P_1$, $P_2$ and $P_3$. It is known that $P_1$ is decidable and $P_2$ is undecidable. Which one of the following is TRUE? $P_3$ is decidable if $P_1$ is reducible to $P_3$ $P_3$ is undecidable if $P_3$ is reducible ... $P_3$ is undecidable if $P_2$ is reducible to $P_3$ $P_3$ is decidable if $P_3$ is reducible to $P_2$'s complement
Consider three decision problems $P_1$, $P_2$ and $P_3$. It is known that $P_1$ is decidable and $P_2$ is undecidable. Which one of the following is TRUE?$P_3$ is decidab...
Kathleen
12.1k
views
Kathleen
asked
Sep 22, 2014
Theory of Computation
gatecse-2005
theory-of-computation
decidability
normal
reduction
+
–
3
votes
2
answers
5
CMI2017-A-10
We have constructed a polynomial time reduction from problem $A$ to problem $B$. Which of the following is a valid inference? If the best algorithm for $B$ takes exponential time, then there is no polynomial time algorithm for $A$ ... don't know whether there is a polynomial time algorithm for $B$, then there cannot be a polynomial time algorithm for $A$.
We have constructed a polynomial time reduction from problem $A$ to problem $B$. Which of the following is a valid inference?If the best algorithm for $B$ takes exponenti...
Tesla!
2.3k
views
Tesla!
asked
Feb 4, 2018
Algorithms
cmi2017
algorithms
reduction
p-np-npc-nph
+
–
0
votes
2
answers
6
CMI2019-A-8
We have constructed a polynomial time reduction from problem A to problem B. Which of the following is not a possible scenario? We know of polynomial time algorithms for both A and B. We only know of exponential time algorithms for both A and B. We only ... polynomial time algorithm for B. We only know an exponential time algorithm for B, but we have a polynomial time algorithm for A.
We have constructed a polynomial time reduction from problem A to problem B. Which of the following is not a possible scenario?We know of polynomial time algorithms for b...
gatecse
662
views
gatecse
asked
Sep 13, 2019
Theory of Computation
cmi2019
reduction
p-np-npc-nph
+
–
1
votes
1
answer
7
CMI2014-A-04
Alan's task is to design an algorithm for a decision problem $P$. He knows that there is an algorithm $A$ that transforms instances of $P$ to instances of the Halting Problem such that $\text{yes}$ instances of $P$ map to $\text{yes}$ instances of the ... $A$ says nothing about whether there is an algorithm for $P$. The Halting Problem can be solved using $A$.
Alan’s task is to design an algorithm for a decision problem $P$. He knows that there is an algorithm $A$ that transforms instances of $P$ to instances of the Halting P...
go_editor
675
views
go_editor
asked
May 27, 2016
Algorithms
cmi2014
algorithms
reduction
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
8
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 21 (Page No. 240)
Let $AMBIG_{CFG} = \{\langle G \rangle \mid \text{G is an ambiguous CFG}\}$. Show that $AMBIG_{CFG}$ is undecidable. (Hint: Use a reduction from $PCP$ ... $a_{1},\dots,a_{k}$ are new terminal symbols. Prove that this reduction works.)
Let $AMBIG_{CFG} = \{\langle G \rangle \mid \text{G is an ambiguous CFG}\}$. Show that $AMBIG_{CFG}$ is undecidable. (Hint: Use a reduction from $PCP$. Given an instance...
admin
395
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
context-free-grammar
reduction
post-correspondence-problem
decidability
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
9
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 25 (Page No. 240)
Give an example of an undecidable language $B$, where $B \leq_{m} \overline{B}$.
Give an example of an undecidable language $B$, where $B \leq_{m} \overline{B}$.
admin
301
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
turing-machine
decidability
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
10
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 7 (Page No. 239)
Show that if $A$ is Turing-recognizable and $A\leq_{m} \overline{A},$ then $A$ is decidable.
Show that if $A$ is Turing-recognizable and $A\leq_{m} \overline{A},$ then $A$ is decidable.
admin
237
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
recursive-and-recursively-enumerable-languages
decidability
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
11
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 23 (Page No. 240)
Show that $A$ is decidable iff $A \leq_{m} 0 ^{\ast} 1^{\ast}$ .
Show that $A$ is decidable iff $A \leq_{m} 0 ^{\ast} 1^{\ast}$ .
admin
201
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
decidability
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
12
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 4 (Page No. 239)
If $A \leq_{m} B$ and $B$ is a regular language, does that imply that $A$ is a regular language? Why or why not?
If $A \leq_{m} B$ and $B$ is a regular language, does that imply that $A$ is a regular language? Why or why not?
admin
188
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
regular-language
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
13
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 22 (Page No. 240)
Show that $A$ is Turing-recognizable iff $A \leq_{m} A_{TM}$.
Show that $A$ is Turing-recognizable iff $A \leq_{m} A_{TM}$.
admin
168
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
recursive-and-recursively-enumerable-languages
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
14
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 6 (Page No. 239)
Show that $\leq_{m}$ is a transitive relation.
Show that $\leq_{m}$ is a transitive relation.
admin
169
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
turing-machine
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
15
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 5 (Page No. 239)
Show that $A_{TM}$ is not mapping reducible to $E_{TM}$. In other words, show that no computable function reduces $A_{TM}$ to $E_{TM}$. (Hint: Use a proof by contradiction, and facts you already know about $A_{TM}$ and $E_{TM}$.)
Show that $A_{TM}$ is not mapping reducible to $E_{TM}$. In other words, show that no computable function reduces $A_{TM}$ to $E_{TM}$. (Hint: Use a proof by contradictio...
admin
192
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
turing-machine
reduction
proof
+
–
1
votes
0
answers
16
Reduction (ACE)
If $L_{1}\preceq L_{2}$ and $L_{2}$ turing recognizable Then $L_{1}$ cannot be A)not REL B)Context Sensitive C)Context Free D)Recursive
If $L_{1}\preceq L_{2}$ and $L_{2}$ turing recognizableThen $L_{1}$ cannot beA)not RELB)Context SensitiveC)Context FreeD)Recursi...
srestha
498
views
srestha
asked
Feb 28, 2019
Theory of Computation
theory-of-computation
reduction
decidability
+
–
3
votes
1
answer
17
GATE Overflow | Mock GATE | Test 1 | Question: 24
Let a problem $P_1$ is reducible to another problem $P_2$. Identify the incorrect statement. (i) If $P_2$ is decidable then $P_1$ must be decidable (ii) If $P_2$ is un-decidable then $P_1$ may or mayn't be undecidable (iii) If $P_2$ is decidable then ... of $P_1$ is independent of $P_2$ (i) and (ii) (ii) and (iv) (ii) and (iii) (iii) and (iv)
Let a problem $P_1$ is reducible to another problem $P_2$. Identify the incorrect statement.(i) If $P_2$ is decidable then $P_1$ must be decidable(ii) If $P_2$ is un-deci...
Ruturaj Mohanty
595
views
Ruturaj Mohanty
asked
Dec 27, 2018
Theory of Computation
go-mockgate-1
decidability
theory-of-computation
reduction
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
18
Doubt : Reducibility
$Question:$ https://gateoverflow.in/63261/%23made-easy $Approach:$ A is reduced to B . Here reduction is done at polynomial time. Here B is solved in polynomial time. So A should also be in polynomial time. Now A can not be harder than ... just an argument for complexity classes? Explain if possible how reduction actually works, and why I couldn't apply it to my problem.
$Question:$ https://gateoverflow.in/63261/%23made-easy $Approach:$ A is reduced to B . Here reduction is done at polynomial time.Here B is solved in polynomial time. S...
HeadShot
279
views
HeadShot
asked
Dec 4, 2018
Algorithms
reduction
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
19
Reduction
A is Recursively Enumerable but not recursive and A reduces to B then which of the following can be true? A) B is Recursive B) B is Recursive Enumerable C) B is Not RE D) B is CFL
A is Recursively Enumerable but not recursive and A reduces to B then which of the following can be true?A) B is RecursiveB) B is Recursive EnumerableC) B is Not RED) B i...
Mk Utkarsh
531
views
Mk Utkarsh
asked
Sep 19, 2018
Theory of Computation
theory-of-computation
reduction
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
20
Reducibility
State which are TRUE and which are FALSE (Question 1) and 2) both have same options) $1)$If there is an algorithm for polynomial time reduction from A to B? $2)$ if there is an algorithm for exponential time reduction from A to B? Consider the ... time algorithm then A can have polynomial time algo $d)$ A can have an polynomial time algorithm then B can have polynomial time algo
State which are TRUE and which are FALSE (Question 1) and 2) both have same options)$1)$If there is an algorithm for polynomial time reduction from A to B?$2)$ if there i...
srestha
551
views
srestha
asked
Sep 12, 2018
Algorithms
theory-of-computation
reduction
+
–
Page:
1
2
next »
Email or Username
Show
Hide
Password
I forgot my password
Remember
Log in
Register