Login
Register
Dark Mode
Brightness
Profile
Edit Profile
Messages
My favorites
My Updates
Logout
Recent questions tagged reduction
0
votes
0
answers
1
Hopcroft, Ullman Theorem 9.7 Reductions
There exists a language Ld = {M | M doesn't belong to L(M)}. Ld is the collection of Turing machines (programs) M such that M does not halt and accept when given itself as input. It is known and proved that Ld is a non- ... and Ld is non-RE, ATM must be non-RE. But we know that ATM is Recursively Enumerable and undecidable. How is this possible?
There exists a language Ld = {M | M doesn't belong to L(M)}. Ld is the collection of Turing machines (programs) M such that M does not halt and accept when given itself a...
dopq12
92
views
dopq12
asked
Mar 5
Theory of Computation
decidability
theory-of-computation
turing-machine
reduction
recursive-and-recursively-enumerable-languages
+
–
2
votes
1
answer
2
#TOC NPTEL ASSIGNMENT Question about reducibility
Please help me understand this question. I have searched on internet, but not avail. Click this to see the question
Please help me understand this question. I have searched on internet, but not avail. Click this to see the question
iarnav
468
views
iarnav
asked
Sep 6, 2021
Theory of Computation
theory-of-computation
reduction
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
3
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 25 (Page No. 240)
Give an example of an undecidable language $B$, where $B \leq_{m} \overline{B}$.
Give an example of an undecidable language $B$, where $B \leq_{m} \overline{B}$.
admin
301
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
turing-machine
decidability
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
4
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 23 (Page No. 240)
Show that $A$ is decidable iff $A \leq_{m} 0 ^{\ast} 1^{\ast}$ .
Show that $A$ is decidable iff $A \leq_{m} 0 ^{\ast} 1^{\ast}$ .
admin
201
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
decidability
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
5
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 22 (Page No. 240)
Show that $A$ is Turing-recognizable iff $A \leq_{m} A_{TM}$.
Show that $A$ is Turing-recognizable iff $A \leq_{m} A_{TM}$.
admin
168
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
recursive-and-recursively-enumerable-languages
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
6
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 21 (Page No. 240)
Let $AMBIG_{CFG} = \{\langle G \rangle \mid \text{G is an ambiguous CFG}\}$. Show that $AMBIG_{CFG}$ is undecidable. (Hint: Use a reduction from $PCP$ ... $a_{1},\dots,a_{k}$ are new terminal symbols. Prove that this reduction works.)
Let $AMBIG_{CFG} = \{\langle G \rangle \mid \text{G is an ambiguous CFG}\}$. Show that $AMBIG_{CFG}$ is undecidable. (Hint: Use a reduction from $PCP$. Given an instance...
admin
395
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
context-free-grammar
reduction
post-correspondence-problem
decidability
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
7
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 7 (Page No. 239)
Show that if $A$ is Turing-recognizable and $A\leq_{m} \overline{A},$ then $A$ is decidable.
Show that if $A$ is Turing-recognizable and $A\leq_{m} \overline{A},$ then $A$ is decidable.
admin
237
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
recursive-and-recursively-enumerable-languages
decidability
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
8
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 6 (Page No. 239)
Show that $\leq_{m}$ is a transitive relation.
Show that $\leq_{m}$ is a transitive relation.
admin
169
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
turing-machine
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
9
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 5 (Page No. 239)
Show that $A_{TM}$ is not mapping reducible to $E_{TM}$. In other words, show that no computable function reduces $A_{TM}$ to $E_{TM}$. (Hint: Use a proof by contradiction, and facts you already know about $A_{TM}$ and $E_{TM}$.)
Show that $A_{TM}$ is not mapping reducible to $E_{TM}$. In other words, show that no computable function reduces $A_{TM}$ to $E_{TM}$. (Hint: Use a proof by contradictio...
admin
192
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
turing-machine
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
10
Michael Sipser Edition 3 Exercise 5 Question 4 (Page No. 239)
If $A \leq_{m} B$ and $B$ is a regular language, does that imply that $A$ is a regular language? Why or why not?
If $A \leq_{m} B$ and $B$ is a regular language, does that imply that $A$ is a regular language? Why or why not?
admin
188
views
admin
asked
Oct 19, 2019
Theory of Computation
michael-sipser
theory-of-computation
regular-language
reduction
proof
+
–
0
votes
2
answers
11
CMI2019-A-8
We have constructed a polynomial time reduction from problem A to problem B. Which of the following is not a possible scenario? We know of polynomial time algorithms for both A and B. We only know of exponential time algorithms for both A and B. We only ... polynomial time algorithm for B. We only know an exponential time algorithm for B, but we have a polynomial time algorithm for A.
We have constructed a polynomial time reduction from problem A to problem B. Which of the following is not a possible scenario?We know of polynomial time algorithms for b...
gatecse
662
views
gatecse
asked
Sep 13, 2019
Theory of Computation
cmi2019
reduction
p-np-npc-nph
+
–
1
votes
0
answers
12
Reduction (ACE)
If $L_{1}\preceq L_{2}$ and $L_{2}$ turing recognizable Then $L_{1}$ cannot be A)not REL B)Context Sensitive C)Context Free D)Recursive
If $L_{1}\preceq L_{2}$ and $L_{2}$ turing recognizableThen $L_{1}$ cannot beA)not RELB)Context SensitiveC)Context FreeD)Recursi...
srestha
498
views
srestha
asked
Feb 28, 2019
Theory of Computation
theory-of-computation
reduction
decidability
+
–
3
votes
1
answer
13
GATE Overflow | Mock GATE | Test 1 | Question: 24
Let a problem $P_1$ is reducible to another problem $P_2$. Identify the incorrect statement. (i) If $P_2$ is decidable then $P_1$ must be decidable (ii) If $P_2$ is un-decidable then $P_1$ may or mayn't be undecidable (iii) If $P_2$ is decidable then ... of $P_1$ is independent of $P_2$ (i) and (ii) (ii) and (iv) (ii) and (iii) (iii) and (iv)
Let a problem $P_1$ is reducible to another problem $P_2$. Identify the incorrect statement.(i) If $P_2$ is decidable then $P_1$ must be decidable(ii) If $P_2$ is un-deci...
Ruturaj Mohanty
594
views
Ruturaj Mohanty
asked
Dec 27, 2018
Theory of Computation
go-mockgate-1
decidability
theory-of-computation
reduction
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
14
Doubt : Reducibility
$Question:$ https://gateoverflow.in/63261/%23made-easy $Approach:$ A is reduced to B . Here reduction is done at polynomial time. Here B is solved in polynomial time. So A should also be in polynomial time. Now A can not be harder than ... just an argument for complexity classes? Explain if possible how reduction actually works, and why I couldn't apply it to my problem.
$Question:$ https://gateoverflow.in/63261/%23made-easy $Approach:$ A is reduced to B . Here reduction is done at polynomial time.Here B is solved in polynomial time. S...
HeadShot
279
views
HeadShot
asked
Dec 4, 2018
Algorithms
reduction
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
15
Reduction
A is Recursively Enumerable but not recursive and A reduces to B then which of the following can be true? A) B is Recursive B) B is Recursive Enumerable C) B is Not RE D) B is CFL
A is Recursively Enumerable but not recursive and A reduces to B then which of the following can be true?A) B is RecursiveB) B is Recursive EnumerableC) B is Not RED) B i...
Mk Utkarsh
531
views
Mk Utkarsh
asked
Sep 19, 2018
Theory of Computation
theory-of-computation
reduction
+
–
0
votes
0
answers
16
Reducibility
State which are TRUE and which are FALSE (Question 1) and 2) both have same options) $1)$If there is an algorithm for polynomial time reduction from A to B? $2)$ if there is an algorithm for exponential time reduction from A to B? Consider the ... time algorithm then A can have polynomial time algo $d)$ A can have an polynomial time algorithm then B can have polynomial time algo
State which are TRUE and which are FALSE (Question 1) and 2) both have same options)$1)$If there is an algorithm for polynomial time reduction from A to B?$2)$ if there i...
srestha
551
views
srestha
asked
Sep 12, 2018
Algorithms
theory-of-computation
reduction
+
–
3
votes
2
answers
17
CMI2017-A-10
We have constructed a polynomial time reduction from problem $A$ to problem $B$. Which of the following is a valid inference? If the best algorithm for $B$ takes exponential time, then there is no polynomial time algorithm for $A$ ... don't know whether there is a polynomial time algorithm for $B$, then there cannot be a polynomial time algorithm for $A$.
We have constructed a polynomial time reduction from problem $A$ to problem $B$. Which of the following is a valid inference?If the best algorithm for $B$ takes exponenti...
Tesla!
2.3k
views
Tesla!
asked
Feb 4, 2018
Algorithms
cmi2017
algorithms
reduction
p-np-npc-nph
+
–
3
votes
0
answers
18
Decidability
a) L is decidable b) L is undecidable c) L is regular d) None of these
a) L is decidableb) L is undecidablec) L is regulard) None of these
Nymeria
872
views
Nymeria
asked
Jan 10, 2018
Theory of Computation
decidability
context-free-language
turing-machine
reduction
+
–
4
votes
1
answer
19
TIFR CSE 2018 | Part B | Question: 15
$G$ respresents an undirected graph and a cycle refers to a simple cycle (no repeated edges or vertices). Define the following two languages. $\text{SCYCLE}=\{(G,k)\mid G \text{ contains a cycle of length at most k}\}$ ... $\text{SCYCLE}$ to $\text{LCYCLE}$).
$G$ respresents an undirected graph and a cycle refers to a simple cycle (no repeated edges or vertices). Define the following two languages.$\text{SCYCLE}=\{(G,k)\mid G ...
Arjun
981
views
Arjun
asked
Dec 10, 2017
Theory of Computation
tifr2018
theory-of-computation
reduction
p-np-npc-nph
non-gate
+
–
1
votes
1
answer
20
Reducibility
Why this is incorrect? For any two languages A and B, if A ⊆ B, then A is reducible to B.
Why this is incorrect? For any two languages A and B, if A ⊆ B, then A is reducible to B.
sunaina rawat
1.0k
views
sunaina rawat
asked
Oct 2, 2017
Theory of Computation
theory-of-computation
reduction
+
–
5
votes
1
answer
21
UTM REDUCTION
please give proper reasoning.
please give proper reasoning.
junaid ahmad
632
views
junaid ahmad
asked
Sep 26, 2017
Theory of Computation
theory-of-computation
reduction
+
–
0
votes
1
answer
22
Test by Bikram | Theory of Computation | Test 2 | Question: 21
A problem $X$ is reducible to problem $Y$ in polynomial time. All the problems in NP can also be reduced to problem $X$. Then, which of the following statements are true? S1 : $X$ is NP complete and $Y$ is in NP. S2 : $X$ is NP complete and ... hard. S4 : $X$ and $Y$ are NP hard. S4 only S1, S2 & S3 S3 & S4 S1, S2, S3 & S4
A problem $X$ is reducible to problem $Y$ in polynomial time. All the problems in NP can also be reduced to problem $X$. Then, which of the following statements are true?...
Bikram
672
views
Bikram
asked
Aug 12, 2017
Theory of Computation
tbb-toc-2
p-np-npc-nph
theory-of-computation
reduction
+
–
3
votes
1
answer
23
TIFR CSE 2016 | Part B | Question: 3
Assume $P \neq NP$. Which of the following is not TRUE? $2$-SAT in NP $2$-SAT in coNP $3$-SAT is polynmial-time reducible to $2$-SAT 4-SAT is polynmial-time reducible to $3$-SAT $2$-SAT in P
Assume $P \neq NP$. Which of the following is not TRUE?$2$-SAT in NP$2$-SAT in coNP$3$-SAT is polynmial-time reducible to $2$-SAT4-SAT is polynmial-time reducible to $3$-...
go_editor
641
views
go_editor
asked
Dec 28, 2016
Theory of Computation
tifr2016
theory-of-computation
reduction
p-np-npc-nph
+
–
1
votes
1
answer
24
CMI2014-A-04
Alan's task is to design an algorithm for a decision problem $P$. He knows that there is an algorithm $A$ that transforms instances of $P$ to instances of the Halting Problem such that $\text{yes}$ instances of $P$ map to $\text{yes}$ instances of the ... $A$ says nothing about whether there is an algorithm for $P$. The Halting Problem can be solved using $A$.
Alan’s task is to design an algorithm for a decision problem $P$. He knows that there is an algorithm $A$ that transforms instances of $P$ to instances of the Halting P...
go_editor
675
views
go_editor
asked
May 27, 2016
Algorithms
cmi2014
algorithms
reduction
+
–
47
votes
5
answers
25
GATE CSE 2016 Set 1 | Question: 44
Let $X$ be a recursive language and $Y$ be a recursively enumerable but not recursive language. Let $W$ and $Z$ be two languages such that $\overline{Y}$ reduces to $W$, and $Z$ reduces to $\overline{X}$ (reduction means the standard ... enumerable. $W$ is not recursively enumerable and $Z$ is recursive. $W$ is not recursively enumerable and $Z$ is not recursive.
Let $X$ be a recursive language and $Y$ be a recursively enumerable but not recursive language. Let $W$ and $Z$ be two languages such that $\overline{Y}$ reduces to $W$,...
Sandeep Singh
12.4k
views
Sandeep Singh
asked
Feb 12, 2016
Theory of Computation
gatecse-2016-set1
theory-of-computation
easy
recursive-and-recursively-enumerable-languages
reduction
+
–
2
votes
1
answer
26
Question on reducibility
Please check if the given answer is correct or not.
Please check if the given answer is correct or not.
shikharV
835
views
shikharV
asked
Jan 4, 2016
Theory of Computation
theory-of-computation
reduction
+
–
52
votes
3
answers
27
GATE CSE 2005 | Question: 45
Consider three decision problems $P_1$, $P_2$ and $P_3$. It is known that $P_1$ is decidable and $P_2$ is undecidable. Which one of the following is TRUE? $P_3$ is decidable if $P_1$ is reducible to $P_3$ $P_3$ is undecidable if $P_3$ is reducible ... $P_3$ is undecidable if $P_2$ is reducible to $P_3$ $P_3$ is decidable if $P_3$ is reducible to $P_2$'s complement
Consider three decision problems $P_1$, $P_2$ and $P_3$. It is known that $P_1$ is decidable and $P_2$ is undecidable. Which one of the following is TRUE?$P_3$ is decidab...
Kathleen
12.1k
views
Kathleen
asked
Sep 22, 2014
Theory of Computation
gatecse-2005
theory-of-computation
decidability
normal
reduction
+
–
3
votes
4
answers
28
To say P=NP
To say P=NP which one of the following is sufficient? (All reductions in polynomial time) A. Reduction of a NP problem to a P problem B. Reduction of a NP-complete problem to a P problem C. Reduction of a P problem to an NP problem D. Reduction of a P problem to an NP-complete problem
To say P=NP which one of the following is sufficient? (All reductions in polynomial time)A. Reduction of a NP problem to a P problemB. Reduction of a NP-complete problem ...
Arjun
2.2k
views
Arjun
asked
Aug 25, 2014
Theory of Computation
reduction
theory-of-computation
normal
+
–
To see more, click for the
full list of questions
or
popular tags
.
Email or Username
Show
Hide
Password
I forgot my password
Remember
Log in
Register