The Gateway to Computer Science Excellence
First time here? Checkout the FAQ!
x
+18 votes
2.5k views

What is the result of evaluating the following two expressions using three-digit floating point arithmetic with rounding?

(113. + -111.) + 7.51

113. + (-111. + 7.51)

  1. 9.51 and 10.0 respectively

  2. 10.0 and 9.51 respectively

  3. 9.51 and 9.51 respectively

  4. 10.0 and 10.0 respectively

asked in Digital Logic by Veteran (59.4k points) | 2.5k views
+2

Rewrite the smaller number such that its exponent matches with the exponent of the larger number.

4 Answers

+34 votes
Best answer

$(113. + -111.) = 1.13 * 10^2 + -1.11 * 10^2 = 0.02 * 10^2 = 2.0 * 10^0$

$2.0 * 10^0 + 7.51 * 10^0 = 9.51 * 10^0 $

 

$(-111. + 7.51) = -1.11 * 10^2 + 7.51 * 10^0 = -1.1 * 10^2 + 0.08 * 10^2 = -1.03 * 10^2 $

$113. + -1.03 * 10^2 = 1.13 * 10^2 + -1.03 * 10^2 = 0.1 * 10^2 = 10.0$

Ref: https://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~eedwards/compsys/float/ 

answered by Veteran (342k points)
selected by
0
sir Is it not same thing as i had posted ?
+1
yes, I just gave an intermediate step :)
0
0
@Mithilesh I had told you not to edit others answer. Everyone won't be thinking like you.
0
there is difference in the answers rt?
+3

@Arjun sir Your ref. link is as always amazing.

0
+7.51∗10^0

why 7.51 is not rounded of to 8.00 in first part addition?
+2
Why it should be rounded? Rounding happens only when it is really required (as we loose precision) or when explicitly told. Also, this question is regarding fixed point arithmetic which is in GATE syllabus but not well covered in most books.
0

@Arjun Sir,

Here in the following step:
(−111.+7.51) = −1.11∗102+7.51∗100 = −1.1∗102+0.08∗102
The rule is to convert the exponent of smaller number as same as of the larger. But, here lager number is 7.51, whose exponent is zero. But, here you have converted the exponent of larger number to that of smaller's (i.e., exponent of 7.51 (larger) to that of -1.11 (smaller))?

Can you please explain it?

0
So floating point additions are not associative right?
0
Thanks for the link @Arjun sir thanks a lot ...really it was life saving ...
+9 votes
3 digit floating point arithmetic is used..
(113.+-111.)+7.51 = 2.00 + 7.51 = 9.51
113.+(-111.+7.51) = 113. + (-111. + 8.00) //rounding off to make compatible 7.51 and 111. with respect  3 digit floating point arithmetic
113. - 103. = 10.0
answered by Veteran (54.8k points)
0
First one is 9.51
Second evaluates to 10.49(let 10.4 as per 3digit )
As per option ..select A coz 10.4 can be rounded to 10 not to 9.51
0

10.51 ???
is it three-digit floating point arithmetic ???

+1

As it is  three-digit floating point arithmetic with rounding   

so Rounding off should be done on (111.+7.51) ie, 103.49 to 103. 

Though ans will remain same..But approach should be this,in my view.103.103.49 is rounded to 103.0

+2
to apply operation ur operand should be THREE FLOATING POINT ARITHMATIC ..
0

Please explain the meaning "three-digit floating point arithmetic with rounding"

+2 votes
–2 votes

2nd part:  113. + (-111. + 7.51)

(-111. + 7.51) = - .111 x 10+ .751 x 10

= 10( - .111 x 102 + .751)

= 10(-11.1 + .751)

= 10(- 10.349)

= - 103.49

now, 113. + (- 103.49) = .113 x 103 - .10349 x 103 

= 103(.113 - .103)  // ignor 49 bcz  three-digit floating point arithmetic with rounding

= 103 x .010

= 10

answered by Junior (955 points)


Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true

35,487 questions
42,746 answers
121,458 comments
42,138 users