2,070 views
0 votes
0 votes

Q: Consider the following premises:-

1.1. What is good for corporations is good for the United States.
2.2. What is good for the United States is good for you.
3.3. What is good for the corporations is for you to buy lots of stuff.

What are the valid conclusions?

1 Answer

0 votes
0 votes

P : Good for corporations.
Q : Good for the United States.
R : Good for you.
S : You buying lots of stuffs.

What is good for corporations is good for the United States.        P $\rightarrow$ Q.
What is good for the United States is good for you.               Q $\rightarrow$ R.
What is good for the corporations is for you to buy lots of stuff.        S $\rightarrow$ P.

1. P $\rightarrow$ Q
2. Q $\rightarrow$ R.
From 1 and 2 by using Hypothetical syllogism. We get 3.
3. P $\rightarrow$  R. which is "Good for corporations is good for you.

4. S $\rightarrow$ P
From 4 and 1 again by using Hypothetical syllogism. We get 5.
5. S $\rightarrow$ Q  . which is "Buying lots of good stuffs is good for United states."

Now from 5 and 2 by again using Hypothetical syllogism. We get 6.
6. S $\rightarrow$ R . which is "Buying lots of good stuffs is good for you".

Conclusion : "Buying lots of good stuffs is good for United states and for you".

edited by

Related questions

2 votes
2 votes
2 answers
2
rahul sharma 5 asked Nov 16, 2017
1,247 views
Consider $F(P), Q(P), L(P)$ denotes statements “Printer $P$ is out of service”, “Print job $P$ is queued” and “Print job $P$ is lost” respectively. Then state...
1 votes
1 votes
2 answers
3