0 votes 0 votes If R and S are two relation in BCNF the natural join of R and S is also in BCNF. above statement true or false.?? Databases databases + – focus _GATE asked Jul 16, 2015 focus _GATE 1.2k views answer comment Share Follow See all 3 Comments See all 3 3 Comments reply Arjun commented Jul 16, 2015 reply Follow Share Well, you should answer this :) 1 votes 1 votes Digvijay Pandey commented Jul 16, 2015 reply Follow Share Do same for 3NF too.. 0 votes 0 votes Devaraj commented Jul 18, 2015 reply Follow Share What is the form of 3nf 0 votes 0 votes Please log in or register to add a comment.
0 votes 0 votes It should be False, In BCNF there should be no redundancy and in natural join of R and S may be reduncancy although both R and S are in BCNF, if R and S are related to each other. rpdhakad answered Jul 20, 2015 rpdhakad comment Share Follow See 1 comment See all 1 1 comment reply focus _GATE commented Jul 20, 2015 reply Follow Share eg: R(table) A B 1 5 2 5 3 6 4 3 S (table) B D 5 4 6 5 3 4 R⋈S(natural join of R and S) A B D 1 5 4 2 5 4 3 6 5 4 3 4 only ONE attribute in above table cannot form key ..in above table key should be compound so means it is false...?? 0 votes 0 votes Please log in or register to add a comment.
0 votes 0 votes False. It is logical, while converting a 3NF relation to BCNF we decompose a 3NF relation into two BCNF relation, and in some cases we get lossless decomposition , so joining 2 BCNF relation is not a BCNF relation Shohra Afaque answered Aug 6, 2015 Shohra Afaque comment Share Follow See all 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.