The Gateway to Computer Science Excellence
First time here? Checkout the FAQ!
x
+1 vote
91 views

Is the following FD in 2NF?

AB -> C                            

Where BD is candidate key.

please explain why this FD is in 2NF.

non-prime,prime ----> non-prime is in 2NF. But why?

Bcz.  as per my knowledge

Every non-prime attribute should be fully functionally dependent on the primary key of R

asked in Databases by Loyal (3.7k points) | 91 views
Think

what if AB is also candidate key ?
Then it satisfies 2NF
Yes, you are correct, it won't violate 2 NF unless either a or b or d derives any other attribute
Man, I'm still in confusion. What should I conclude then ?
You should check that

1)AB is candidate key or not

if yes then check that from all the possible FD, only single A or B or C is able to derive any attribute

                   if yes then not in 2 NF

                   Else no then relation is in 2NF

Check out this question asked in gate-2008

https://gateoverflow.in/492/gate2008-69

Here, {Catalog_no, ( Title , Author )} are candidate keys.

1.Catalog_no --> {Title , Author , Publisher , Year } 

2.{Publisher , Title , Year} --> Price

Which implies, Catalog_no --> Price.

Is it the reason for considering the relation to be in 2NF??

 

yes you are correct it is because of transitive dependency

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions

0 votes
0 answers
1
asked in Databases by Madhab Boss (7.3k points) | 61 views
+1 vote
0 answers
2
asked in Linear Algebra by sid1221 Loyal (2.8k points) | 78 views


Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true

29,997 questions
37,681 answers
96,746 comments
35,329 users