2.1k views

Which of the following disk scheduling strategies is likely to give the best throughput?

1. Farthest cylinder next

2. Nearest cylinder next

3. First come first served

4. Elevator algorithm

edited | 2.1k views
+1
what is Farthest cylinder next algorithm
+1

Option (B) and (D) both are acceptable. For more details please check comment of @Vicky rix ji.

0
As throughput is asked can it be interpreted as at any point of time during disk scheduling which Algo gives max head movements i.e head movements per second?

Correct me if m wrong.

1. Farthest cylinder next $\rightarrow$ This might be candidate for worst algorithm . This is false.
2. Nearest cylinder next $\rightarrow$ This is output.
3. First come first served $\rightarrow$ This will not give best throughput. It is random .
4. Elevator algorithm $\rightarrow$ This is good but issue is that once direction is fixed we don't come back, until we go all the other way. So it does not give best throughput.
edited by
+2
I am confused between nearest cylinder next or elevator?? Because both gives good throughput. what should be the answer?? and why?? why it shouldnt be elevator since it doesnt even have starvation problem??
+1
How to decide between nearest cylinder and elevator algo.
0
Option B is like SSTF ...
0

Hi @sushmitavaishali jhalani and Puja Mishra ji,

First of all thanks for raising good point. But could you please provide some counter example where Elevator algorithm will perform better then Nearest cylinder next ?

+5
In nearest cylinder next, we cant fix the direction in which go next

but in Elevator , first we fix the diection then go only that direction and then come back to opposite direction

like if we have 10,50 request and head is on 20

then nearest cylinder next , 20->10->50   total seek time 10+40=50

elevator 20->50->10  total seek time=30+40=70 ( direction is fix toward 50)
+6

As long as the block request string is given, we cannot decide between B) and D)

B) is not always the best EX:

+1

throughput put depends on the number of requests served per second  as we always go for the shortest reach SSTF Does this best as it tries to serve the maximum number of processes in less time

+2

Thank you @Vicky rix ji.

+3
Scan is called elevator algorithm ...
0

For more reference go to this question.

https://gateoverflow.in/8227/gate2015-1-30

How SCAN Algo hear move one side head and then return.

+1
It should be Elevator algorithm since it provides more uniform waiting time than the SSTF or nearest cylinder next algorithm.
Option B

Nearest cylinder next but it can lead to starvation
Nearest cylinder next . in this many pages can be accessed in less time  . So throughput will be high .
+1 vote

The only catch in the question is that they are asking for the most likely to give the best throughput.

Even if for some cases SCAN can have better results but the most likely to result the best throughput is Nearest cylinder Algo ;)

The only catch in the question that I could see is that it says "which is most likely" .
So, even if for some cases SCAN can result better but the most likely case is that Nearest cylinder can result best throughput ;)

D.

Both the Nearest Cylinder and Elevator are high on throughput.But I will go with ELEVATOR.

Reason:

Nearest Cylinder Next algo will have a overhead of computing the nearest cylinders of the queue.

1