624 views

1 Answer

Best answer
2 votes
2 votes
S1: Every attr is the prime attribute then the relation is in 3nf

R(A, B , C, D)  = { A -> C, C -> A, B - > D, D -> B}

KEY AB, CD

PRIME ATTR A, B, C, D.

HENCE STATEMENT 1 IS TRUE.

S2: Every attribute is the prime attribute then the relation is in BCNF,

consider the above case only, the relation is in 3nf not in BCNF.

Hence statement 2 is False.

S3: R(A,B,C,D)  {A -> BCD, B - > ACD, C ->D, D-> C}

KEY A, B

here there is no case of partially dependency because, we have simple cand key, means single attributes candidate key,

So, statement 3 is also true,

Seeing the options,

D) S2 is false,

Is the correct option.
selected by
Answer:

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
1
bhucho asked Sep 13, 2023
267 views
please can someone help with part (a) of this question.
9 votes
9 votes
2 answers
2
Deepthi_ts asked Apr 26, 2017
614 views
IF a relation R(A,B,C,D,E) whereAB is the key andADE->Cso is this in 2NF or not?Do Partial dependency exist??? because C is derived from ADE (A is part of key AB)
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
3
1 votes
1 votes
2 answers
4
garam_masala_ asked Nov 21, 2017
465 views