0 votes 0 votes if i neglect T2 then its conflict sserilizable but if i dont neglect T2 then its not conflict serilizable ??? sumit goyal 1 asked Dec 26, 2017 sumit goyal 1 442 views answer comment Share Follow See all 7 Comments See all 7 7 Comments reply Ashwin Kulkarni commented Dec 26, 2017 reply Follow Share Here T2 is doing nothing hence you can neglect T2. And then there will be only one transaction is remaining. Hence no possibility of any conflicting actions. Hence we directly say that this schedule is conflict serializable as well as view serializable. 0 votes 0 votes sumit goyal 1 commented Dec 26, 2017 reply Follow Share what if r(x) would be there in t2 in place of w(x) 0 votes 0 votes vamp_vaibhav commented Dec 27, 2017 reply Follow Share Ashwin.. Why You said t2 is not doing anything.. I mean there is write write conflict between t2 nd t1.. Is it because of the abort?? Plz explain 1 votes 1 votes sumit goyal 1 commented Dec 27, 2017 reply Follow Share vamp_vaibhav because T1 is not reading anything from what T2 is writing to agar T2 abort /neglect hojyga then T1 pe fark ni padega ? i think 1 votes 1 votes vamp_vaibhav commented Dec 27, 2017 reply Follow Share Sumit.. Hmm if we exchange the order of write then also it won't affect the result bcz t2 is getting aborted.. You are right.. Thnkew ... 1 votes 1 votes sumit goyal 1 commented Dec 27, 2017 reply Follow Share @vamp_vaibhav bhai agar r(x) hota w(x) ki jaga so what do you think should we neglect T2 then also ?? 1 votes 1 votes vamp_vaibhav commented Dec 27, 2017 reply Follow Share Definitely there would be conflict dependency between t2 to t1 but what difference does it make.. Question remain same.. T2 will be aborted first nd there would be no need of rollback in t1.. Therefore it will be also conflict serializable.. 1 votes 1 votes Please log in or register to add a comment.