1,621 views

3 Answers

0 votes
0 votes

I think we can decompose to BCNF but it will violate the dependency preserving.
Here AC is the candidate key
BCNF decomposition 
R1(ABC) (AC is the candidate key )        R2(BCD) (BC+ is the candidate key)     R3(DE) ( D+=DE D is the candidate key)

AC->BC                                                   BC->D                                               D->E
 

Further no decomposition is possible ! I guess. So option B
 

Related questions

4 votes
4 votes
2 answers
1
kalpashri asked Nov 20, 2014
9,752 views
consider a relation R(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,,i,j)following fd's hold-AB->CA->DEB->FF->GHD->IJdecompose the relation into 3nf and BCNF.
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
2
rahul sharma 5 asked Dec 15, 2017
1,227 views
Minimum relations to decompose into BCNF and 4NF.List only relation names with attributes and total number of relations
2 votes
2 votes
0 answers
3
h4kr asked Dec 15, 2022
360 views
Since the schema is already in 3NF we can keep the relations to 1, cant we? If you think the answer is different please explain how
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
4
Varun Raj Akula asked Mar 12, 2022
388 views
Can anyone please explain about Statement 4 ? I know that transitive dependencies are allowed in 3NF as long as RHS is Prime Attribute. But, what is intransitive dependen...