218 views

1 Answer

1 votes
1 votes
NO Deadlock does not imply Progress. Progress implies NO Deadlock. In case of NO Deadlock, Progress may or may not be there.

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
1
ajayraho asked Oct 23, 2022
876 views
What is the significance of infinite loop that is written in every example of process synchronisation? What would happen if there wasn't any infinite loop?
0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
2
Shiv Gaur asked Oct 15, 2018
294 views
In Peterson's solution if P0 sets it's interested and then preempt or terminate the P1 will keep waiting at while loop for indefinite time then how progress is guaranteed...
3 votes
3 votes
0 answers
3
iarnav asked Sep 28, 2018
717 views
Any implementation of a critical section requires the use of an indivisible machine- instruction ,such as test-and-set?Is the above statement True or False?
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
4
Tushar Garg asked Aug 22, 2018
389 views
In peterson's process synchronisation the process which perform 4th statement i.e (turn= process )first will get the critical section but if this is happen then their is...