The Gateway to Computer Science Excellence
First time here? Checkout the FAQ!
x
+1 vote
108 views

You are given a list of positive integers along with a sequence of operations from the set $\left \{ *,+\right \}$ .You construct expressions from these two lists so that:

  • The numbers in the expression are drawn from the first list, without repetition and without altering their order.
  • All the operators in the second list are used in the expression, in the same order.

For example, if the two lists are $[1,3,2,1,4]$ and  $[′∗′,′+′]$  the set of possible expressions you can form are 
$1∗3+2,1∗3+1,1∗3+4,1∗2+1,1∗2+4,\ldots,2∗1+4,1∗3+2,1∗3+1,1∗3+4,1∗2+1,1∗2+4,\ldots,2∗1+4$
For each expression, the value is computed by bracketing operators from the right. That is, the expressions above are evaluated as

$1∗(3+2),  1∗(3+1),  1∗(3+4),  1∗(2+1),  1∗(2+4),…,2∗(1+4),  1∗(3+2),  1∗(3+1),  1∗(3+4),  1∗(2+1),  1∗(2+4),…,2∗(1+4)$
The aim is to determine maximum value among these expressions. In this example, the maximum value is $18$, from the expression $3*2+4,$ which is evaluated as $3∗(2+4) = 3*6 =18$. 
You may assume that the length of the first list is more than the length of the second list. 
Describe an algorithm to solve this problem.

asked in Algorithms by (435 points)
edited by | 108 views
0
I think the answer should be O(n log^k (n))
0
WHY!!!
0
the bracketing done in example is only applicable in that example right?
0
In the example they are showing how to bracket the elements of the first list.

Suppose the first list is {1,2,3,4,5} and the second list is {+,*,+}

Then one expression will be 1+(2*(3+4))

I hope this helps.
0
I have done the solution below. Check it tell me if anything is wrong.
0
I think the answer is correct THANK YOU

1 Answer

+1 vote

Solution

 

 

answered by Loyal (8.3k points)
edited by
+1
You are not taking into account that the numbers from the list should be in the same order, in that case max heap won't work out as it changes the order.

Your algorithm is wrong ,

Let's take an example : Numbers list 2,3,1,4 and operator sequence *,+. In this case the maximum value possible is 3*(1+4)=15 and this does not use the 3 largest number so clearly your solution is wrong.

@Arjun Suresh please the change the accepted answer to not accepted.
0
Vinay thanks a lot for pointing out my mistake. Without it I would be happy with my wrong explanation. I have edited my answer can u please check it once more and tell me whether I am wrong or not.

Related questions



Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true

39,713 questions
46,750 answers
140,552 comments
58,380 users