667 views
0 votes
0 votes
The Transaction : -   

   T1         T2

  R(a)

  W(a)

                 R(a)

   C

                   C

The above shown schedule is not Dirty read Right ?

2 Answers

Best answer
2 votes
2 votes
Of course It is Dirty read. When $T2$ read item $A$, It was written by uncommitted  $T1$. The value of item A that is read by $T2$ is called dirty data because it has been created by a transaction that has not completed and committed yet; hence, this problem is also known as the dirty read problem.

You must be confusing "Dirty read probelm" with "recoverability"... The given Schedule is Recoverable But it has dirty read.
selected by

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
1
sripo asked Nov 25, 2018
1,244 views
If I have dirty read which is write-read conflict does it imply that the schedule is non recoverable?Do all anomalies result of conflict result in non recoverable thereby...
0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
4
sripo asked Nov 25, 2018
697 views
S=r1(A),w2(A),r3(A),w1(A),w3(A)Is this Schedule Non Recoverable? As there is a dirty read happening at w2(A)->r3(A)