recategorized by
3,200 views
18 votes
18 votes
Show that proposition $C$ is a logical consequence of the formula$$A\wedge \left(A \to \left(B \vee C\right)\right) \wedge \left( B \to \neg A\right)$$using truth tables.
recategorized by

3 Answers

Best answer
33 votes
33 votes
$A\wedge(A\to (B\vee C))\wedge ( B\to \neg A)$
$\equiv A \wedge (\neg A \vee B \vee C)(\neg A \vee \neg B)$
$\equiv (A\wedge \neg B) \wedge (\neg A \vee B \vee C)$
$\equiv (A\wedge \neg B \wedge C)$
$C$ is logical consequence of a formula $X$ if, $X\to C$ is true.

$\begin{align}\text{Here, }X &\equiv A\wedge (A\to (B\vee C))\wedge ( B\to \neg A)\\ &\equiv A\wedge \neg B \wedge C\end{align}$

Checking,   
$(A\wedge \neg B \wedge C)\to C$
$\equiv  \neg(A\wedge \neg B \wedge C) \vee C$
$\equiv \neg A \vee B \vee \neg C \vee C$
$\equiv 1.$

So, $C$ is logical consequence of $A\wedge (A\to (B\vee C))\wedge (B\to \neg A).$
edited by
11 votes
11 votes
$A$ $B$ $C$ $A\to \left(B \vee C\right)$ $B\to\neg A$ $A\wedge \left(A \to \left(B \vee C\right)\right) \wedge \left( B \to \neg A\right)$ $C$
T T T T F F T
T T F T F F T
T F T T T T T
T F F F T F T
F T T T T F T
F T F T T F T
F F T T T F T
F F F T T F T
  1. Logical consequence (also entailment) is one of the most fundamental concepts in logic. It is the relationship between statements that holds true when one logically "follows from" one or more others.
8 votes
8 votes

Using Inference Rules,

Modus Ponens, 
1. $(A \wedge (A \rightarrow (B \vee C ))) \rightarrow (B \vee C)$

2. $(B \rightarrow \neg A) \equiv (\neg B \vee \neg A)$

Modus Tollens,
3. $((\neg B \vee \neg A) \wedge A) \rightarrow \neg B$

Disjunctive syllogism,
4. $(\neg B \wedge (B \vee C)) \rightarrow C $

Related questions

24 votes
24 votes
4 answers
1
Kathleen asked Sep 29, 2014
8,226 views
The proposition $p \wedge (\sim p \vee q)$ is:a tautologylogically equivalent to $p \wedge q$logically equivalent to $p \vee q$a contradictionnone of the above
13 votes
13 votes
3 answers
2
Kathleen asked Sep 23, 2014
2,421 views
Show that the formula $\left[(\sim p \vee q) \Rightarrow (q \Rightarrow p)\right]$ is not a tautology.Let $A$ be a tautology and $B$ any other formula. Prove that $(A \ve...
23 votes
23 votes
9 answers
3
makhdoom ghaya asked Nov 14, 2016
5,188 views
Show that the conclusion $(r \to q)$ follows from the premises$:p, (p \to q) \vee (p \wedge (r \to q))$