The Gateway to Computer Science Excellence
First time here? Checkout the FAQ!
x
+12 votes
2.4k views

Hari(H), Gita(G), Irfan(I) and Saira(S) are siblings (i.e., brothers and sisters). All were born on 1st January. The age difference between any two successive siblings (that is born one after another) is less than three years. Given the following facts:

  1. Hari's age + Gita's age > Irfan's age + Saira's age
  2. The age difference between Gita and Saira is one year. However Gita is not the oldest and Saira is not the youngest.
  3. There are no twins.

In what order they were born (oldest first)?

  1. $HSIG$
  2. $SGHI$
  3. $IGSH$
  4. $IHSG$
asked in Numerical Ability by Veteran (101k points)
edited by | 2.4k views

2 Answers

+9 votes
Best answer

Given that, 

  • $H+G > S+I$
  • No twins, 
  • And either $G=S+1$ or $S = G+1$
  • G is not the oldest and S is not the youngest. 

Lets analyze each case, 

Case 1:

$G=S+1$, 

It implies, $H > I - 1$, Since twins are not possible $H>I$

Case 2:

$G = S - 1$, 

It implies $H > I + 1$

Therefore, both cases imply H is older than I, also G and S must be placed successively. 

Only option B satisfies these implications. 

answered by Active (1.6k points)
selected by
+10 votes
Correct answer is B. Though, its a hit-n-trial method.

option A: There is no such possibility, as it is given that there are no twins, so S and G must be consecutive.

option B.For some combination of ages of SGHI we can satisfy (1) condition like taking ages as, S=5 G=5 H=3 I=1, (2) and (3) are also satisfied. So, all the 3 conditions are satisfied.

option C: IGSH, so I > G and S > H (as there are no twins) and so I + S > G + H - violates condition 1.

option D: IHSG, so I > H and S > G and so I + S > H + G - violates condition 1.
answered by (253 points)
+1
can someone explain bit more??
+2

@ thor,

Take options one by one.

A) HSIG --> As per condition 2 and 3, geeta and saira should come consecutive. (False)

B) SGHI --> Take age of Saira as x then G becomes x-1 (since their age diff is 1)

                                                           H becomes x-4 (since max age diff could be 3)

                                                            I  becomes x-7 (since max age diff could be 3)

Now to follow condition no one age(H) + age(G) > age(I) + age(S) => x-4+x-1 > x-7+x => 2x-5 > 2x-7 (True)

C) IGSH --> Take age of Irfan as x then   G becomes x-3 (since max age diff could be 3)

                                                           S becomes x-4 (since their age diff is 1)

                                                           H  becomes x-7 (since max age diff could be 3)

Now to follow condition no one age(H) + age(G) > age(I) + age(S) => x-7+x-3 > x+x-4 => 2x-10 > 2x-4 (False)

D) IHSG --> Take age of Irfan as x then   H becomes x-3 (since max age diff could be 3)

                                                           S becomes x-6 (since max age diff could be 3)

                                                           G  becomes x-7 (since their age diff is 1)

Now to follow condition no one age(H) + age(G) > age(I) + age(S) => x-3+x-7 > x+x-6 => 2x-10 > 2x-6 (False)

So option B is correct.

Hope it is helpful.

+1
I have a question, how can you take S and G equal ? their diff. is 1 @ujjwal saini


Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true

39,440 questions
46,623 answers
139,376 comments
57,021 users