933 views
Give a relational algebra expression using only the minimum number of operators from $(∪, −)$ which is equivalent to $R$ $∩$ $S.$

edited | 933 views

$R-(R-S)$

There is no need to use Union operator here.

Just because they say you can use operators from $(∪, −)$ we don't need to use both of them.

Also they are saying that only the minimum number of operators from (∪, −) which is equivalent to $R ∩ S$.

My expression is Minimal.

by Boss (41.9k points)
edited
0
can you give any example ...according to your solution ....
+3

air1ankit  see this example Answer: R − ((R ∪ S) − S)

Just imagine the Venn diagram in mind.
by Boss (33.9k points)
0

Can you please say Is it necessary to use both U,-?

Can I represent  R ∩ S=R-(U-S) ?

where U is the universal set.

+2
You should answer what the question demands. So you have to use only (∪, −) operators with R and S.
+7

Question says only the minimum number of operators from (∪, −) which is equivalent to R ∩ S. Using union is unnecessary here !

p ={(1,1) , (2,2) , (1,2)}

q={(1,2) , (2,10) ,(3,2)}

p ח q = { (1,2) }

p-q={ (1,1) (2,2) }

p-(p-q) = { (1,2) }

so  p-(p-q) = p ח q = { (1,2) }
by Active (4.6k points)

Ans: R U S - { (R-S) U (S-R) }

by (11 points)