14 votes

Three candidates, Amar, Birendra and Chanchal stand for the local election. Opinion polls are conducted and show that fraction $a$ of the voters prefer Amar to Birendra, fraction $b$ prefer Birendra to Chanchal and fraction $c$ prefer Chanchal to Amar. Which of the following is impossible?

- $(a, b, c) = (0.51, 0.51, 0.51);$
- $(a, b, c) =(0.61, 0.71, 0.67);$
- $(a, b, c) = (0.68, 0.68, 0.68);$
- $(a, b, c) = (0.49, 0.49, 0.49);$
- None of the above.

28 votes

Best answer

$6$ preference order for voter are possibe:

$ABC.ACB,BCA,BAC,CAB,CBA$ also Given that

$a=ABC+ACB+CAB(A$ prefer over $B) ---(1)$

$b=BCA+BAC+ABC(B$ prefer over $C) ---(2)$

$c=CAB+CBA+BCA(C$ prefer over $A) ---(3)$

Adding $1,2$ and $3$ we get

$a+b+c=2(ABC+BCA+CAB)+ACB+BAC+CBA$

Now we know that $ABC+ACB+BAC+BCA+CAB+CBA=1$ therefore

$[ABC+ACB+BAC+BCA+CAB+CBA]<[2(ABC+BCA+CAB)+ACB+BAC+CBA]<2(ABC+ACB+BAC+BCA+CAB+CBA)$

Hence we can say that value of $a+b+c$ must be between $1$ and $2$

option (c) value greater than $2$ hence correct answer is (**c**)

3

We know that (ABC+ACB+BAC+BCA+CAB+CBA)=1 therefore 2 *(ABC+ACB+BAC+BCA+CAB+CBA) = 2.

[ABC+ACB+BAC+BCA+CAB+CBA] < [2(ABC+BCA+CAB)+ACB+BAC+CAB]

< 2(ABC+ACB+BAC+BCA+CAB+CBA)

This can be written as, 1 < (a+b+c) < 2.

It means (a+b+c) must be lies bw 1 and 2, all options follow except option (c).

So,(C) is ans.

[ABC+ACB+BAC+BCA+CAB+CBA] < [2(ABC+BCA+CAB)+ACB+BAC+CAB]

< 2(ABC+ACB+BAC+BCA+CAB+CBA)

This can be written as, 1 < (a+b+c) < 2.

It means (a+b+c) must be lies bw 1 and 2, all options follow except option (c).

So,(C) is ans.

0 votes

I will just answer for option (C) , rest 3 would be then easy to derive.

LET THERE BE ONLY 100 PEOPLE .

(TRY TO DRAW A Venn diagram FOR MY EXPLANATION, IT WOULD BE SIMPLE TO UNDERSTAND)

Amar= Modi , Birendra = Kejriwal , C= Rahul

GIVEN THAT :

Any 68 people say (Modi > Kejriwal) (means Modi is greater than Kejriwal)

Any 68 people say (Kejriwal > Rahul)

But we have only 100 people. So there is definitely some intersection.

So at least (68+68-100)=36 people made both the statements (i.e Modi > Kejriwal and Kejriwal > Rahul means these 36 people actually mean Modi > Kejriwal).

So these 36 people can NEVER Contradict themselves and make the 3rd statement : "Rahul > Modi" .

So only at most remaining 100-36 = 64 people can make the 3rd statement but option (C) says 68 people made this statement which is NEVER possible as discussed above.

LET THERE BE ONLY 100 PEOPLE .

(TRY TO DRAW A Venn diagram FOR MY EXPLANATION, IT WOULD BE SIMPLE TO UNDERSTAND)

Amar= Modi , Birendra = Kejriwal , C= Rahul

GIVEN THAT :

Any 68 people say (Modi > Kejriwal) (means Modi is greater than Kejriwal)

Any 68 people say (Kejriwal > Rahul)

But we have only 100 people. So there is definitely some intersection.

So at least (68+68-100)=36 people made both the statements (i.e Modi > Kejriwal and Kejriwal > Rahul means these 36 people actually mean Modi > Kejriwal).

So these 36 people can NEVER Contradict themselves and make the 3rd statement : "Rahul > Modi" .

So only at most remaining 100-36 = 64 people can make the 3rd statement but option (C) says 68 people made this statement which is NEVER possible as discussed above.