It is not Conflict Serializable as there is dependency between $T_1$ and $T_2$ in both the directions for conflicting operations (cycle in precedence graph).
For View Equivalence:
- If transaction $T_i$ reads initial value of any data item $X$ in one schedule it must do the same in all the equivalent schedules
- If transaction $T_i$ writes the final value of any data item $X$ in one schedule, it must do the same in all the view-equivalent schedules.
- If transaction $T_i$ reads data item $X$ written by transaction $T_j$, it must do the same in all the view equivalent schedules
So, the given schedule is not View Serializable as it requires $T_1$ to come before $T_2$ to ensure $T_1$ reads first and $T_2$ to come before $T_1$ to ensure $T_1$ writes last, which is not possible.