edited by
8,412 views
29 votes
29 votes

Which of the following is NOT True?

(Read $\wedge$ as AND, $\vee$ as OR, $\neg$ as NOT,  $\rightarrow$ as one way implication and $\leftrightarrow$ as two way implication)

  1. $((x \rightarrow y) \wedge x) \rightarrow y$

  2. $((\neg x \rightarrow y) \wedge (\neg x \rightarrow \neg y)) \rightarrow x$

  3. $(x \rightarrow (x \vee y))$

  4. $((x \vee y) \leftrightarrow (\neg x \rightarrow \neg y))$

edited by

10 Answers

3 votes
3 votes
option D.
((x or y) <-> (x' -> y' ))
=((x+y) <-> (x+y'))
=(x+y)'.(x+y')' + (x+y).(x+y') (as we know <-> evaluated as Xnor gate like A<->B = A'B' +AB)
=x'y'.x'.y + x+yy'
=0+x+0
=x
value of x may be 0 or 1 so it need not be false always
but all other option are true ( getting 1 after evaluating ) so closest possible ans is D
1 votes
1 votes

The question is saying which of the following is false not contradiction ..so by making the truth values u will see that options A,B and C are tutology . Here I'll prove C  (make truth table or follow the properties)  :

X->(XvY)=> ~XvXvY  => ~XvX is T and TvY=>T so option C is  a tutology

now coming to D make truth table(here only 2 variables so it's not that difficult)  n you will see that when x=F and y=F .It is False .

NOTE: option D is not a contradiction but it is a contigency 

0 votes
0 votes
option (d) because bi-implies means LHS should be equivalent to RHS, but here : L.H.S = (X V Y)

 

R.H.S = (~X ---> ~Y) = (~ ~X V ~Y) = (X V ~Y).
edited by
0 votes
0 votes

Let us assume the given proposition is false first then if we get any contradiction, our assumption is wrong i.e., the given proposition is not false

 

Answer:

Related questions

27 votes
27 votes
2 answers
1
34 votes
34 votes
6 answers
2
33 votes
33 votes
6 answers
3
40 votes
40 votes
5 answers
4
Kathleen asked Oct 9, 2014
12,977 views
Consider the following state table for a sequential machine. The number of states in the minimized machine will be$$\begin{array}{|l|l|ll|}\hline \text{} & \text{} & \tex...