1,861 views
1 votes
1 votes
In this question If I consider first total no of outcomes as 6^5 , then I divided it be 6C5 *5! since there are 5 similar dices so the outcome (1 2  3 4 5 ) will be similar to (5 4 3 2 1) .

Now what's wrong with this approach ?

2 Answers

Best answer
1 votes
1 votes
$\underbrace{{}^6C_5}_{\text{5 different outcomes}} +\underbrace{ {}^6C_1 . {}^5C_3 }_{\text{only 1 outcome appearing twice}}+ \underbrace{{}^6C_2 .  {}^4C_1}_{\text{2 outcomes appearing twice}} +\underbrace{ {}^6C_1 . {}^5C_2 }_{\text{one outcome appearing thrice}}+ \underbrace{{}^6C_1 . {}^5C_1}_{\text{one outcome appearing thrice and 1 outcome appearing twice}} + \underbrace{{}^6C_1 . {}^5C_1}_{\text{one item appearing 4 times}} +\underbrace{ {}^6C_1}_{\text{one outcome appearing 5 times}}\\
= 6 +  60 +60 + 60 + 30 + 30 + 6\\
=252.$
selected by
1 votes
1 votes

for every dice we have 6 possibility which are independent of any other dice, Hence total possible outcomes if 5 similar dices are rolled, given that each outcome for a dice is equally likely is given by : $6^5$

Related questions

8 votes
8 votes
1 answer
1
Sahil Gupta asked Nov 23, 2014
4,913 views
There are six runners in the 100-yard dash. How many ways are there for three medals to be awarded if ties are possible? (The runner or runners who finish with the fastes...
1 votes
1 votes
0 answers
3
Piyush Kapoor asked Oct 14, 2015
1,076 views
I am unable to get this logic since in both of these algorithms we need to have a record of future requirement of the processes so then why is it that resource allocation...