The Gateway to Computer Science Excellence
First time here? Checkout the FAQ!
x
+2 votes
159 views

Which of the following statements regarding $LR(0)$ parser is FALSE?

  1. A $LR(0)$ configurating set cannot have multiple reduce items
  2. A $LR(0)$ configurating set cannot have  both shift as well as reduce items
  3. If a reduce item is present in a $LR(0)$ configurating set it cannot have any other item
  4. A $LR(0)$ parser can parse any regular grammar
in Compiler Design by Veteran (418k points)
edited by | 159 views
0
Sir, cannot we have a reduce move and a GOTO action in same canonical item ?
+1
Not for LR(0) parser
0
I just realized how dumb that question was. Sorry sir
0
If there is a reduce move we place it only in the action part right???

So what happens when we have a reduce item and Goto item in the same state??
0
When we reduce using a production say $A \to Bcd$, we pop 3 items from stack - since production used for REDUCE has 3 symbols, and move to a state given by GOTO(S, A) where S is the stack top after the pop moves.

1 Answer

+1 vote
No grammar with empty production can be LR(0). But empty rules are allowed in regular grammar as the only condition for a grammar to be regular is to be either left linear or right linear.
by Veteran (418k points)
0

@Arjun sir, isn't B false?

0
Yes. Just corrected the option
+1
Sir, can we say that since a given regular grammar can be ambiguous and LR(0) parsers can't parse any ambiguous grammar, so option (d) is false ?
+1
Can you give an ambiguous regular grammar?
+4

Ambiguous Regular:

S→A | B
A→a
B→a

Answer:

Related questions

Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true
50,092 questions
55,239 answers
190,758 comments
85,996 users