Register

Made easy CBT2
closed

• closed by
284 views
0 votes
0 votes
closed as a duplicate of: MadeEasy Test Series 2019: Databases - Transaction And Concurrency
$R_2(A)$$W_1(B)$$W_1(C)$$R_3(B)$$R_2(B)$$R_1(A)$$C_1$$R_2(C)$$C_2$$W_3(A)$$C_3$

Is this schedule allowed under 2PL?
• closed by
User Avatar
Voting & Accepting an answer helps improve the community
← PreviousNext →
← Previous in categoryNext in category →

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
1
Gate Fever asked Jan 28, 2019
587 views
made easy cbt2
consider the following relational schema R(A,B,C,D,E,F,G) AB->C,BC->A,AC->B,B->D,D->E how many minimum relations required to decompose R into BCNF which satisfy lossless and FDP decomposition? initially i got 4 relation as R1(A,B,C) R2(D,E) R3(B,D) R4(A,B,F,G) but in R1 and R2 there is no common attribute, hence it will not be lossless??am i correct
consider the following relational schema R(A,B,C,D,E,F,G)AB->C,BC->A,AC->B,B->D,D->Ehow many minimum relations required to decompose R into BCNF which satisfy lossless an...
User Avatar
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
3
Vasu_gate2017 asked Jan 30, 2017
178 views
MadeEasy CBT2 q37
Correct Answer
Correct Answer
User Avatar
0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
4
Mrityudoot asked Jan 12
147 views
Made Easy Test Series
Isn’t F$^{+}$ minimal cover? If C $\rightarrow$ A is already there, then why does augmented CD $\rightarrow$ A needs to be?
Isn’t F$^{+}$ minimal cover? If C $\rightarrow$ A is already there, then why does augmented CD $\rightarrow$ A needs to be?
User Avatar
Link Copied!