222 views
1 votes
1 votes
In timestamp ordering,$W-timestamp(Q)$ denotes the largest timestamp of any transaction that executed $write(Q)$ successfully. Suppose that, instead, we defined it to be the timestamp of the most recent transaction to execute $write(Q)$ successfully.Would this change in wording make any difference ? Explain your answer.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
1
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
2
akash.dinkar12 asked Apr 1, 2019
247 views
Although SIX mode is useful in multiple-granularity locking, an exclusive and intend-shared (XIS) mode is of no use. Why is it useless ?
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
3
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
4
akash.dinkar12 asked Apr 1, 2019
191 views
When a transaction is rolled back under timestamp ordering, it is assigned a new timestamp. Why can it not simply keep its old timestamp ?