Register

DBMS Korth Edition 4 Exercise 16 Question 16 (Page No. 634)

204 views

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Voting & Accepting an answer helps improve the community
← PreviousNext →
← Previous in categoryNext in category →

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
1
akash.dinkar12 asked Apr 1, 2019
427 views
DBMS Korth Edition 4 Exercise 16 Question 18 (Page No. 634)
Use of multiple-granularity locking may require more or fewer locks than an equivalent system with a single lock granularity. Provide examples of both situations, and compare the relative amount of concurrency allowed.
Use of multiple-granularity locking may require more or fewer locks than an equivalent system with a single lock granularity. Provide examples of both situations, and com...
User Avatar
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
2
akash.dinkar12 asked Apr 1, 2019
255 views
DBMS Korth Edition 4 Exercise 16 Question 17 (Page No. 634)
Although SIX mode is useful in multiple-granularity locking, an exclusive and intend-shared (XIS) mode is of no use. Why is it useless ?
Although SIX mode is useful in multiple-granularity locking, an exclusive and intend-shared (XIS) mode is of no use. Why is it useless ?
User Avatar
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
3
akash.dinkar12 asked Apr 1, 2019
199 views
DBMS Korth Edition 4 Exercise 16 Question 15 (Page No. 634)
When a transaction is rolled back under timestamp ordering, it is assigned a new timestamp. Why can it not simply keep its old timestamp ?
When a transaction is rolled back under timestamp ordering, it is assigned a new timestamp. Why can it not simply keep its old timestamp ?
User Avatar
Link Copied!