The Gateway to Computer Science Excellence
0 votes
58 views

UGCNET-June-2019-I-30

The proposition ‘No historians are non-mathematician’ is equivalent to which of the following proposition?

  1. All historians are mathematicians
  2. No historians are mathematicians
  3. Some historians are mathematicians
  4. Some historians are not mathematicians

 

in Verbal Ability by Veteran (424k points)
retagged by | 58 views

1 Answer

0 votes

Let $x$ : A person

      $h(x)$: $x$ is a historian  and

      $m(x)$: $x$ is a mathematician

No historians are non-mathematicians $\equiv$ There does not exist $x$ such that $x$ is historian and not a mathematician.$\equiv \sim \exists x(h(x)\wedge \sim m(x)) \equiv \forall x(\sim h(x) \vee m(x))$

  1. All historians are mathematicians $\equiv$ For all $x$, if $x$ is a historian, then it has to be  a mathematician $\equiv \forall x(h(x)\rightarrow m(x))\equiv \forall x(\sim h(x) \vee m(x))$
  2. No historians are mathematicians $\equiv$ There does not exist $x$ such that $x$ is a historian and $x$ is a mathematician$\equiv \sim \exists x( h(x) \wedge m(x)) \equiv \forall x(\sim h(x) \vee \sim m(x))$
  3. Some historians are mathematicians $\equiv$ There exist some $x$ such that $x$ is a historian and also a mathematician$\equiv \exists x( h(x) \wedge m(x))$
  4. Some historians are not mathematicians $\equiv$ There exist some $x$ such that $x$ is a historian and also not a mathematician$\equiv \exists x( h(x) \wedge \sim m(x))$

$\therefore$ Option $1.$ is correct.

by Boss (21.5k points)
Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true
50,648 questions
56,422 answers
195,194 comments
99,833 users