Register

GATE Overflow Test Series | Digital Logic | Test 1 | Question: 24

• edited by
430 views

1 Answer

Best answer
4 votes
4 votes
We avoid a static-1 hazard if every adjacent $1s$ in K-map is covered by an implicant. In Option A, this is TRUE. In all other options, at least $2$ adjacent $1s$ are there which are not being covered by an implicant.

Reference: https://gateoverflow.in/1814/gate2006-38
• selected by
User Avatar
Voting & Accepting an answer helps improve the community
Answer:
← PreviousNext →
← Previous in categoryNext in category →

Related questions

1 votes
1 votes
1 answer
3
gatecse asked Jul 19, 2020
319 views
GATE Overflow Test Series | Digital Logic | Test 1 | Question: 18
If the number of prime implicants and essential prime implicants of $F(A,B,C,D) = \sum(0,6,8,13,14)$ are represented by $m$ and $n$ respectively, the value of $2^m\times 3^n = $
If the number of prime implicants and essential prime implicants of $F(A,B,C,D) = \sum(0,6,8,13,14)$ are represented by $m$ and $n$ respectively, the value of $2^m\times ...
User Avatar
4 votes
4 votes
1 answer
4
gatecse asked Feb 8, 2021
525 views
GATE Overflow Test Series | Mock GATE | Test 5 | Question: 54
The implicants being chosen for a circuit implementation are marked in the following four Karnaugh-maps all representing the same function $f$. In which of them, a static-$1$ hazard is possible? (Mark all the appropriate choices)
The implicants being chosen for a circuit implementation are marked in the following four Karnaugh-maps all representing the same function $f$. In which of them, a static...
User Avatar
Link Copied!