retagged by
723 views
4 votes
4 votes

A relation $\text{R}$ on a set $\text{A}$ is said to be triangular iff $a\text{R}b$ and $c\text{R}b$ together imply $a\text{R}c,$ For all $a,b,c \in \text{A} \,\,\,and \,\,\, a \neq c.$

Which of the following is false?

  1. $\text{A}$ relation $\text{S}$ is reflexive and triangular only if $\text{S}$ is an equivalence relation.
  2. $\text{A}$ relation $\text{S}$ is reflexive and triangular if $\text{S}$ is an equivalence relation.
  3. If a relation $\text{S}$ is symmetric and triangular, then $\text{S}$ is a transitive relation.
  4. If a relation $\text{S}$ is transitive and triangular, then $\text{S}$ is a symmetric relation.
retagged by

1 Answer

4 votes
4 votes
lets assume  A = {1,2,3,4}

Given that, A relation is said to be triangular iff aRb and cRb ==> aRc for all a,b,c belongs to A

Option A, B) S = {(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(1,2),(2,1)} ===> equivalence relation.

               Now we have to check whether it is reflexive and triangular relation

               {(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4)} ====> reflexive relation.

               (1,1), (2,1) ==> (1,2) is present in S

               (2,2), (1,2) ==> (2,1) is present in S

               so it is triangular relation.

option A ,B) is True.

Option C) S = {(1,2),(2,1),(2,2)} is symmetric and triangular relation.

               how triangular relation is shown below

               (1,2), (2,2) ==>  (1,2) is present in S

                (2,2), (1,2) ==> (2,1) is present in S

           But S is not transitive relation. (1,2),(2,1) ==> (1,1)  is missing

option C) should be False.

Option D) S = {(4,2),(2,1),(4,1),(2,4)} is transitive and triangular relation.

                   but not symmetric relation. (1,2), (1,4) are missing.

Option D) should also be False.
Answer:

Related questions

3 votes
3 votes
1 answer
2