All hill stations have a lake $\Rightarrow \forall x( h(x)\to (\exists y, l(y) \wedge has(x,y)))$
Ooty has two lakes $\Rightarrow \exists x ( o(x) \wedge \exists y,z ( has(x,y,z)\wedge l(y)\wedge l(z)\wedge (z!=y) )$
Here, $h(x) \to x \text{ is hill station}$
- $l(x) \to x \text{ is lake }$
- $has(x,y)\to x \text{ has }y$
- $has(x,y,z)\to x\text{ has } y, z$
- $o(x)\to x \text{ is Ooty}$
- Ooty is not a hill station $\implies$ we can not derive this above arguments, Ooty has two lakes already, if Ooty had $0$ lakes only then this can become true.
- No hill station can have more than one lake
All arguments here are saying are if we have hill station, it can have lake. It is nowhere told that how many lakes it has. So, this is false.
Answer: (D) neither (i) nor (ii)