menu
search
Log In
Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true

Subjects

Network Sites

 GO Mechanical
 GO Electrical
 GO Electronics
 GO Civil
 CSE Doubts

GATE2015 ME-3: GA-7

3 votes
1.3k views

Given below are two statements followed by two conclusions. Assuming these statements to be true, decide which one logically follows.

Statements:

  1. No manager is a leader.
  2. All leaders are executives.

Conclusions:

  1. No manager is an executive.
  2. No executive is a manager.
  1. Only conclusion I follows.
  2. Only conclusion II follows.
  3. Neither conclusion I nor II follows.
  4. Both conclusions I and II follow.
in Verbal Aptitude
retagged by 1.3k views

2 Answers

5 votes
 
Best answer
Every leader is executive and no manager is leader. So, manager can be other than leader which also includes executive. So (I)  is FALSE.

(ii) is also FALSE because some executive who is not a leader can be a manager.

C IS CORRECT

edited by
3 votes
Answer is C,we can check by venn diagram.
← Prev. Next →
← Prev. Qn. in Sub. Next Qn. in Sub. →
Answer:

Related questions

4 votes
2 answers
1
556 views
GATE2015 ME-3: GA-4
Tanya is older than Eric. Cliff is older than Tanya. Eric is older than Cliff. If the first two statements are true, then the third statement is: True False Uncertain Data insufficient
Tanya is older than Eric. Cliff is older than Tanya. Eric is older than Cliff. If the first two statements are true, then the third statement is: True False Uncertain Data insufficient
asked Feb 15, 2016 in Verbal Aptitude Akash Kanase 556 views
1 vote
2 answers
2
655 views
GATE2017 ME-2: GA-9
All people in a certain island are either 'Knights' or 'Knaves' and each person knows every other person's identity. Knights never lie, and Knaves ALWAYS lie. $P$ says "Both of us are Knights". $Q$ says "None of us are Knaves". Which one of the ... $P$ and $Q$ are Knaves. The identities of $P, Q$ cannot be determined.
All people in a certain island are either 'Knights' or 'Knaves' and each person knows every other person's identity. Knights never lie, and Knaves ALWAYS lie. $P$ says "Both of us are Knights". $Q$ says "None of us are Knaves". Which one of the following can be logically inferred ... . $P$ is a knight; Q is a Knave. Both $P$ and $Q$ are Knaves. The identities of $P, Q$ cannot be determined.
asked Feb 27, 2017 in Verbal Aptitude Arjun 655 views
4 votes
2 answers
3
1.1k views
GATE2013 AE: GA-9
All professors are researchers Some scientists are professors Which of the given conclusions is logically valid and is inferred from the above arguments: All scientists are researchers All professors are scientists Some researchers are scientists No conclusion follows
All professors are researchers Some scientists are professors Which of the given conclusions is logically valid and is inferred from the above arguments: All scientists are researchers All professors are scientists Some researchers are scientists No conclusion follows
asked Feb 16, 2016 in Verbal Aptitude Akash Kanase 1.1k views
10 votes
2 answers
4
2.1k views
GATE2016-2-GA-08
All hill-stations have a lake. Ooty has two lakes. Which of the statement(s) below is/are logically valid and can be inferred from the above sentences? Ooty is not a hill-station. No hill-station can have more than one lake. (i) only. (ii) only. Both (i) and (ii) Neither (i) nor (ii)
All hill-stations have a lake. Ooty has two lakes. Which of the statement(s) below is/are logically valid and can be inferred from the above sentences? Ooty is not a hill-station. No hill-station can have more than one lake. (i) only. (ii) only. Both (i) and (ii) Neither (i) nor (ii)
asked Feb 12, 2016 in Verbal Aptitude Akash Kanase 2.1k views
Dark theme
Muffin by Hélio Chun
Thanks to Q2A
...