The Gateway to Computer Science Excellence
First time here? Checkout the FAQ!
x
+14 votes
3.2k views

For a magnetic disk with concentric circular tracks, the seek latency is not linearly proportional to the seek distance due to

  1. non-uniform distribution of requests

  2. arm starting and stopping inertia

  3. higher capacity of tracks on the periphery of the platter

  4. use of unfair arm scheduling policies

asked in Operating System by Veteran (59.9k points)
retagged by | 3.2k views

5 Answers

+17 votes
Best answer
The answer is B, because due to Inertia

Whenever your read-write head moves from 1 track to another track, it has to face resistance due to change in state of motion including speed and direction, which is nothing but inertia. Hence the answer is B
answered by Active (2k points)
edited by
+16 votes
answered by Boss (13.6k points)
edited by
+4
I also agree with this answer.
Have drawn inferences from the link above and this paper:

An excerpt:
"A seek is composed of
• a speedup, where the arm is accelerated until it reaches half of the seek distance or a fixed maximum
velocity"

http://www2.cs.uh.edu/~paris/7360/PAPERS03/IEEEComputer.DiskModel.pdf

Though, it's a despair that the book that I encountered this question, marks the answer as C and the Gate solution key as D.

Have already wasted an hour on this question.. duh!
0

Why not use of unfair arm scheduling policies

What if SCAN or LOOK algorithms are used?

–1
can u do something better than downvoting?
0

The answer cannot be B, latency used by itself is used to refer to rotational latency and not seek time. Even then I find no other option to be suitable.

0 votes
Answer is B

Because of the factors of acceleration and deceleration of actuator arm.
answered by (269 points)
0 votes

What about this answer as option (C).
The seek latency is not linearly proportional to seek distance due to the higher capacity of tracks on the periphery of the latter. The higher capacity of the tracks is responsible for the presence of the desired cell in the wrong part and because of this certain amount of time is required for this cell to reach the read-write head so that data transfer can take place.

answered by (297 points)
0 votes

Note that we are asked “why seek latency is not linearly proportional to the seek distance”, that is why “duration required to travel a distance is not linearly proportional to the distance”. This definitely has to do with either the road surface or road shape. The surface here is uniform magnetic, but road shape does change. Here we don’t take turns, but put break and go on reverse gear, again put break and drive straight. Stopping a moving car takes time, it doesn’t stop instantly. Similarly accelerating stopped car to full speed takes time.
Why not option A: We have not been asked anything related to going to different cities located far from each other.
Why not option B: Tracks might be related with rotational latency / timings but has nothing to do with seek time.
Why not option C: Question is simple. Its just asking why going from one position to another takes different time each time. Policy come in to play when we are asked to read different sectors to decide which sectors to read first (if I am correctly interpreting what is meant by policy).

answered by (219 points)
Answer:

Related questions

Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true
47,925 questions
52,325 answers
182,362 comments
67,789 users