retagged by
1,848 views

3 Answers

Best answer
21 votes
21 votes

For proving this we should know that 

$\sum_d(V) =2e \quad \to(1)$

Because one edge consist of two vertices and hence contributes two degrees.

For any Graph $G$

$\sum_d(V)=\sum_d(V_{odd})+\sum_d(V_{even}) \quad \to(2)$

From $(1)$ we can say that $\sum_d(V)$ should be even.

$\sum_d(V_{even})$ will be always even ($\because$ sum of even numbers is always even)

So, for $(2)$ to be true  $\sum_d(V_{odd})$ should be even  ($\because \text{even}+\text{odd}=\text{odd}$ & $\text{even}+\text{even}=\text{even})$

In $\sum_d(V_{odd}),$ every degree is odd.

So, for $\sum_d(V_{odd})$  to be Even, the number of odd-degree vertices should be even ($\because$ only when we add an even number of odd numbers, we get an even number).

edited by
2 votes
2 votes
Question. Will be number of odd degree vertex in finite graph is even.

Take any random graph I.e. $K_3$ have $0$ odd degree  vertex and $K_4$ has even $(4)$ odddegree vertex.

Simple line has $2$(even) vertex with odd degree.
edited by
1 votes
1 votes

$\underbrace{1+3}=4$

even # of odd numbers.

$\underbrace{1+3+5}=9$

odd # of odd numbers


Handshaking Lemma: $\sum$ (degree of V) $=2$ (number of edges)

$\sum$ (odd degree vertices) $+\sum$ (even degree vertices) $=2m$ (even)

$\underbrace{d_1+d_2+d_3+d_4+….d_n}=2m$ (even)

                Even number

  1. All are even numbers.
  2. There are even # of odd numbers.

$\sum$ (even degree vertices) always even.

$\sum$ (odd degree vertices) in order to make this also even there should be even # of odd degree vertices in the graph.

Related questions

48 votes
48 votes
3 answers
1
Arjun asked Nov 15, 2015
4,394 views
Show that all vertices in an undirected finite graph cannot have distinct degrees, if the graph has at least two vertices.
19 votes
19 votes
3 answers
2
Kathleen asked Oct 8, 2014
5,739 views
Prove that in finite graph, the number of vertices of odd degree is always even.
2 votes
2 votes
0 answers
3
23 votes
23 votes
9 answers
4
makhdoom ghaya asked Nov 14, 2016
5,205 views
Show that the conclusion $(r \to q)$ follows from the premises$:p, (p \to q) \vee (p \wedge (r \to q))$