edited by
12,907 views
43 votes
43 votes

Let $R$ be a relation on the set of ordered pairs of positive integers such that $((p,q),(r,s)) \in R$ if and only if $p-s=q-r$. Which one of the following is true about $R$?

  1. Both reflexive and symmetric
  2. Reflexive but not symmetric
  3. Not reflexive but symmetric
  4. Neither reflexive nor symmetric
edited by

7 Answers

1 votes
1 votes
p – s = q – r

=> p + r = q + s

=> sum of first terms = sum of second terms of ordered pair (p,q) and (r,s).

we shall now take examples to reach the answer.

Is (1,3)R(1,3) ? No because 1+1 != 3+3. Therefore the Relation is not reflexive.

consider (2,3) and (3,2). Now (2,3) R (3,2) because 2+3=3+2. Also (3,2) R (3,2).This relation is symmetric.

From the same example we can see that the  transitive pair would be (2,3) and (3,2) which again satisfies the condition, therefore is transitive.

Hence option C is a matching with our conclusion.
0 votes
0 votes

Option C

Given, $((p,q),(r,s)) \in R$ iff $p-s=q-r$

Simple check:

Let $(p,q) = a \ \& \ (r,s)  =b \implies aRb$

For Reflexive:

$a R a? \implies (p,q) R (p,q)?$

$p-q \neq q-p, hence\ not \ reflexive.$

For Symmetric: 

If $aRb$ then $bRa \ ?$ 

$(p,q)R(r,s) → (r,s)R(p,q) ? $

LHS : Is given $((p,q),(r,s)) \in R$ iff $p-s=q-r$

RHS: $r-q = s-p \implies p-s = q-r$

$LHS = RHS , hence \ symmetric$

edited by
–1 votes
–1 votes
((p, q), (r, s)) ∈ R if and only if p–s = q–r

(p, q) is not related to (p, q)

as p-q is not same as q-p.

The relation is symmetric because if p–s = q–r, then s-q = s-p. 
Answer:

Related questions