retagged by
16,027 views
45 votes
45 votes

Which one of the following is FALSE?

  1. There is a unique minimal DFA for every regular language

  2. Every NFA can be converted to an equivalent PDA.

  3. Complement of every context-free language is recursive.

  4. Every nondeterministic PDA can be converted to an equivalent deterministic PDA.

retagged by

6 Answers

2 votes
2 votes
Deterministic PDA cannot handle languages or grammars with ambiguity.

nondeterministic can handle languages with ambiguity and any context-free grammar.

Therefore,  every nondeterministic PDA cannot be converted to an equivalent deterministic PDA.
0 votes
0 votes
As we know there are several languages (CFL) for which we only have NPDA, i.e. these languages cannot be recognized by DPDA. For example
L= {$w^{}$$w^{r}$ | w ϵ {a,b}* } is a CFL but not DCFL, i.e. it can be recognized by NPDA but not by DPDA.
Answer:

Related questions

26 votes
26 votes
6 answers
5
Kathleen asked Sep 22, 2014
8,219 views
$(1217)_8$ is equivalent to$(1217)_{16}$$(028F)_{16}$$(2297)_{10}$$(0B17)_{16}$
34 votes
34 votes
7 answers
6
46 votes
46 votes
7 answers
8
Kathleen asked Sep 22, 2014
21,366 views
The above DFA accepts the set of all strings over $\{0,1\}$ that begin either with $0$ or $1$.end with $0$.end with $00$.contain the substring $00$.