4 4 votes TRUE/FALSE id sign biased expo mantissa 1 0 00000001 00000000000000000000000 is first smallest no in IEEE 754 representationid 2 0 11111110 11111111111111111111111 is largest no represented through IEEE 754 3 0 00000000 00000000000000000000001 is smallest de-normalized no 4 0 00000000 11111111111111111111111 largest unnormalized no 5 0 11111111 11111111111111111111111111 largest no represented through IEEE 754 6 0 00000000 10000000000000000000000000 smallest normalized no 7 0 00000000 10000000000000000000000001 2nd smallest normalized no 8 0 00000000 1000000000000000000000000 is first smallest no in IEEE 754 representationid 9 0 00000001 1000000000000000000000000 is 2nd smallest no in IEEE 754 representationid 10 0 00000001 000000000000000000000001 is 2nd smallest no in IEEE 754 representationid 11 0 11111111 11111111111111111111111111 largest no represented through IBM 370 For each id(row i.e exponent and mantissa) there is a corresponding red statement you hv to tell that it is true or false. CO & Architecture + – yes 4.4k views answer comment Share Follow Print 0 reply Please log in or register to add a comment.
4 4 votes All 0 exponent and non-zero mantissa means a number is denormalized in IEEE 754 - no implied 1 before ".". Also, bias for denormalized numbers is "-126" and that for normalized is "-127". IEEE 754 Single precision Exponent Sign Mantissa Value Remark 00000000 0 00...0 0 Special value 0 00000001 0 00...0 $1.0 \times 2^{-126}$ Smallest positive normalized number 00000000 0 00...001 $1.0 \times 2^{-149}$ Smallest positive denormalized number 11111111 0 100..0 ... 111..1 QNAN When exponent is all 1's number is NAN. Mantissa here can be any non-zero value. If mantissa starts with 1, it is QNaN meaning the value is indeterminate. 11111111 0 000...1 0111...1 SNaN Same as above but mantissa bits starting with 0 and used to represent Signalling NaN which are used to represent invalid numbers. 11111111 0 000...000 $+\infty$ Positive infinity 11111110 0 1111...1 $(2 - 2^{-23}) \times 2^{127}$ Largest normalized number 00000000 0 111...111 $\left(1 - 2^{-23}\right ) \times 2^{-126}$ Largest de-normalized number Similarly, we can see for negative numbers. Ref: http://steve.hollasch.net/cgindex/coding/ieeefloat.html Arjun answered Oct 25, 2015 Arjun comment Share Follow See all 7 Comments 7 7 Comments reply Show 4 previous comments bahirNaik commented Dec 25, 2015 reply Follow flag sir please correct the sign of power in the below parts.minus signs are missing. (2−2-23 )×2127 Largest normalized number (1−2-23)×2−126 Largest de-normalized number Also please explain why there is a difference in the highlighted red part. For largest denormalized I understood its a geometric series of mantissa part but I didn't get why there is change in largest normalized part even if mantissa are same. 1 1 replyShare Arjun commented Dec 25, 2015 reply Follow flag thanks. Corrected that. For normalized numbers in IEEE 754 representation there is an "implicit 1" before the decimal point. So, actual value will be (1.0 + mantissa) * 2^ {exp} 0 0 replyShare bahirNaik commented Dec 26, 2015 reply Follow flag Ohh yess...got it ! Its like I counted all forgot myself :P thnks sir ! 1 1 replyShare Please log in or register to add a comment.