retagged by
930 views
15 votes
15 votes
Consider the following proposition :

$\text{A}_{n} = \underbrace{(p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow (p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow (\dots)))))}_{\text{number of p’s + number of q’s = n}}.$

Which of the following is false for $\text{A}_{n}:$
A. For every $n > 2, \text{A}_{n}$ is a tautology.
B. For every $n > 2, \text{A}_{n}$ is a contradiction.
C. For every $n = 2, \text{A}_{n}$ is a contingency.
D. For every $n > 2, \text{A}_{n}$ is Not contingency.
retagged by

2 Answers

14 votes
14 votes

$\color{red}{\text{Video Solution:}}$ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCVNVv3F5u0&ab_channel=GOClassesforGATECS

For $n = 2 : \text{A}_{2} = p \rightarrow q ,$ which is a contingency.

For $n = 3 : \text{A}_{3} = p \rightarrow( q \rightarrow p ) ,$ which is a tautology.

For $n = 4 : \text{A}_{4} = p \rightarrow( q \rightarrow (p \rightarrow q) ) ,$ which is a tautology.

So, for $n =2, \text{A}$ is contingency, and for any value $n>2, \text{A}$ is tautology.

$\color{red}{\text{Video Solution:}}$ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCVNVv3F5u0&ab_channel=GOClassesforGATECS

edited by
0 votes
0 votes
When n=2 :- A$_{2}$ = (p $\rightarrow$ q) $\equiv$ (p' + q)  => A$_{2}$ is contingency.

When n=3 :- A$_{3}$ = (p $\rightarrow$ (q $\rightarrow$ p)) $\equiv$ (p' + q' + p) $\equiv$ T  => A$_{3}$ is tautology.

When n=4 :- A$_{4}$ = (p $\rightarrow$ (q $\rightarrow$ (p $\rightarrow$ q))) $\equiv$ (p' + q' + p' + q) $\equiv$ T  => A$_{4}$ is tautology.

So, when n>2, the pattern for A$_{n}$ is (p' + q' + p' + q' + ... + q' + p) or (p' + q' + p' + q' + ... + p' + q), and both patterns are always true.

Therefore, when n>2, A$_{n}$ is tautology.
Answer:

Related questions

7 votes
7 votes
2 answers
3