835 views
2 votes
2 votes

As soon as I have studied I got that count to infinity problem will not occur if A advertise its window first to B before B can. As a result B gets information that X is un reachable now, and system will be in stable state.

Screen shot of above theory:-

Now I also know that how to solve this using split horizon i.e. B sends its routing table to A but it will not sends that row in the advertising table which contain entry which shows that "B knows the path to X which passes through A". and thus it will not send this infor to A.

But I am getting difficulty in understanding what is split horizon.

In the line saying: "Node B can still advertise the  value for X......." till last line.

1 Answer

Best answer
2 votes
2 votes

The Last Screenshot is an Split Horizon With Reverse Poision

Here B will advertise X in its routing table but the value is set as infinity stating that X is unrechable and giving a hint that A should not use this value since it was computed from A's Routing Table....

The first Screenshot is Simple Split Horizon where the entry of X in B's Routing Table itself is not Shared with A.

Hence the only diff is that in Reverse Poison Split Horizon the entry for X is shown as infi and in Simple Split Horizon the entry for X itself is ommited from the table while sharing the Routing Table info..

selected by

Related questions

2 votes
2 votes
1 answer
1
Sunil8860 asked Sep 16, 2017
622 views
suppose C-D link is broken then what will be the vector of D instantaneously ??
2 votes
2 votes
1 answer
2
♥_Less asked Oct 8, 2017
844 views
Can split horizon alone prevent count to infinity problem or we must use poison reverse with split horizon ?