recategorized by
11,352 views
28 votes
28 votes

Consider the relation scheme $R(A, B, C)$ with the following functional dependencies:

  • $A, B \rightarrow C,$
  • $C \rightarrow A$
  1. Show that the scheme $R$ is in $3\text{NF}$ but not in $\text{BCNF}$.
  2. Determine the minimal keys of relation $R$. 
recategorized by

6 Answers

2 votes
2 votes
BCNF; X---- >a ( X must be SK).

AB ---->C (I OK NO_PROBLEM)

C----->A (C IS NOT SK,SO BCZZ OF THIS BCNF IS FAILED)

 

in case of,

3NF X----->Y

X= MUST be SK. or Y= Must be PRIME ATTRIBUTE.

so in given question, the prime attribute is {A, B, C} Non-Prime Attribute { NULL }

so,

AB---->C (No problem )

C-----A (No problem )

so it follow 3NF but not BCNF
0 votes
0 votes
Here AB,BC both are Candidate key, So There is no non-prime attribute.

So The relation is 3NF,2NF because there is no non prime attribute

And

The relation is not BCNF because this FD’s(C-->A) LHS is not a superkey

Related questions

24 votes
24 votes
3 answers
1
Kathleen asked Oct 8, 2014
4,537 views
Consider the relation scheme.$$\begin{array}{ll} \text{AUTHOR} & \text{(ANAME, INSTITUTION, ACITY, AGE)} \\\hline \text{PUBLISHER} & \text{(PNAME, PCITY)} \\\hline \te...
7 votes
7 votes
1 answer
2
go_editor asked Feb 12, 2018
2,581 views
What is the equivalent minimal Boolean expression (in sum of products form) for the Karnaugh map given below?
25 votes
25 votes
3 answers
3
Kathleen asked Oct 8, 2014
3,746 views
What is the number of binary trees with $3$ nodes which when traversed in post-order give the sequence $A, B, C ?$ Draw all these binary trees.
27 votes
27 votes
5 answers
4
Kathleen asked Oct 8, 2014
6,623 views
Let $G_1$ and $G_2$ be subgroups of a group $G$.Show that $G_1 \cap G_2$ is also a subgroup of $G$.Is $G_1 \cup G_2$ always a subgroup of $G$?.