edited by
15,718 views
49 votes
49 votes

Consider the following three statements about link state and distance vector routing protocols, for a large network with $500$ network nodes and $4000$ links. 

[S1]: The computational overhead in link state protocols is higher than in distance vector protocols. 

[S2]: A distance vector protocol (with split horizon) avoids persistent routing loops, but not a link state protocol. 

[S3]: After a topology change, a link state protocol will converge faster than a distance vector protocol. 

Which one of the following is correct about $S1$, $S2$, and $S3$?

  1. $S1$, $S2$, and $S3$ are all true.
  2. $S1$, $S2$, and $S3$ are all false. 
  3. $S1$ and $S2$ are true, but $S3$ is false.
  4. $S1$ and $S3$ are true, but $S2$ is false.
edited by

5 Answers

Answer:

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
6
0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
7
Jaydeep gupta 1 asked May 21, 2018
391 views
Can distance vector routing implementation is possible with delay?usually, is it done by hop-count?also, Can link state routing implementation is possible with hop-count?...