374 views
0 votes
0 votes

Soln. (My Solution)

.Lets Break it down shall we ?

Lets take an instance:-     

                  Dno          Dname          Phone            Office

                    1                 A                  X,Y                 Z,P

We know  Dno --> Phone,Office,Dname

Currently above one is not in 1nf so by converting it we get:- 

Dno            Dname           Phone          Office

 1                    A                    X                   Z

1                     A                     X                  P

1                     A                     Y                   Z

1                     A                      Y                   P

Now its in 1nf. But Now the Primary key is (Dno,Phone,Office) --->  Dname

but we know that Dno --> Dname

So its a Partial Dependency Hence not in 2nf

Lets Break it Down Further :----

A (Dno , Dname)     Dno as Primary Key

B (Dno,Phone,Office) and Primary key is (Dno,Phone,Office) collectively. So only two tables is required.

So is it a right statement :-  "If a relation has m number of multi-valued attribute then no need for m extra table only 1 table extra required like i just showed above" Ain't that right?

Is my solution Worth it ?

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Related questions

5 votes
5 votes
1 answer
2
Ashish Sharma 3 asked Nov 24, 2017
2,731 views
How many minimum relations required for the above ER diagram?According to me it should be 7. Please let me know the answer according to you.
1 votes
1 votes
1 answer
3
Xylene asked Sep 19, 2017
1,486 views
Minimum number of relations or tables required ?
5 votes
5 votes
1 answer
4
Dulqar asked Jan 6, 2017
9,685 views
Given R with n tuples S with m tuples n<m then How many minimum and maximum tuples in follwing relations . Please Justify with Reason / ExamplesR-SS-RR Left Join SR Nat...