3,022 views
0 votes
0 votes

Consider a magnetic disk consisting of $16$ heads and $400$ cylinders. This disk has four $100$-cylinder zones with the cylinders in different zones containing $160, 200, 240.$ and $280$ sectors, respectively. Assume that each sector contains $512$ bytes, average seek time between adjacent cylinders is $1\: msec,$ and the disk rotates at $7200$ RPM. Calculate the

  1. disk capacity,
  2. optimal track skew, and
  3. maximum data transfer rate.

1 Answer

0 votes
0 votes

Answer:

a)$720896000$

c)$17,203,200 \frac{\text{Bytes}}{\text{sector}}$

Explanation:

The size of the zone $=\text{platter} \times \text{cylinders}\times \frac{\text{sectors}}{\text{track}}\times \frac{\text{Bytes}}{\text{sector}} $

Capacity of zone 1: $16 \times 100\times 160 \times 512 = 131072000\;\text{Bytes}$

Capacity of zone 2: $16 \times 100\times 200 \times 512 = 163840000\;\text{Bytes}$

Capacity of zone 3: $16 \times 100\times 240 \times 512 = 196608000\;\text{Bytes}$

Capacity of zone 4: $16 \times 100\times 280 \times 512 = 229376000\;\text{Bytes}$

Sum$=131072000 + 163840000 + 196608000 + 229376000 = 720896000$

(c) The rate of data transfer will be maximum when the cylinders are being written or read in the outermost zone.

In the outer zone, in one second, $280$ sectors are being read $120$ times.

Thus the maximum data rate $= 280 \times 120 \times 512 = 17,203,200 \;\frac{\text{Bytes}}{\text{sec}}$

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
2
admin asked Oct 28, 2019
756 views
If a disk has double interleaving, does it also need cylinder skew in order to avoid missing data when making a track-to-track seek? Discuss your answer.
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
3
0 votes
0 votes
0 answers
4
admin asked Oct 28, 2019
217 views
Why are optical storage devices inherently capable of higher data density than magnetic storage devices? Note: This problem requires some knowledge of high-school physics...