Given:
Let’s assume the following two statements:
S1: a = b + c + d
S2: z = b + c + m
Note: Since S1 is followed directly by S2 with nothing in between, OUT(S1) = IN(S2) by definition of basic blocks in liveness analysis.
Also, OUT(S1) and OUT(S2) can be any subset of variables used in S1 or S2, respectively, depending on what variables are live after those statements. That’s why we are free to assume reasonable values for them during elimination.
Now, we evaluate each option:
Option B: OUT(S1) = IN(S1) ∪ USE(S1)
LHS = OUT(S1)
Assume OUT(S1) = {b} (as explained above)
RHS = IN(S1) ∪ USE(S1)
IN(S1) = {b} (assumed)
USE(S1) = {b, c, d}
RHS = {b} ∪ {b, c, d} = {b, c, d}
LHS = {b}
RHS = {b, c, d}
LHS ≠ RHS → Incorrect
Option C: OUT(S1) = IN(S2) ∪ OUT(S2)
LHS = OUT(S1)
Assume OUT(S1) = {b, d}
RHS = IN(S2) ∪ OUT(S2)
IN(S2) = {b, d} (from previous logic)
OUT(S2) = {b, c, m} (assumed live variables)
RHS = {b, d} ∪ {b, c, m} = {b, c, d, m}
LHS = {b, d}
RHS = {b, c, d, m}
LHS ≠ RHS → Incorrect
Option D: OUT(S1) = USE(S1) ∪ IN(S2)
LHS = OUT(S1)
Assume OUT(S1) = {d}
RHS = USE(S1) ∪ IN(S2)
USE(S1) = {b, c, d}
IN(S2) = {d}
RHS = {b, c, d} ∪ {d} = {b, c, d}
LHS = {d}
RHS = {b, c, d}
LHS ≠ RHS → Incorrect
Option A: OUT(S1) = IN(S2)
LHS = OUT(S1)
RHS = IN(S2)
Since S1 is immediately followed by S2, we know OUT(S1) = IN(S2) directly
LHS = RHS → Correct Answer