418 views

1 Answer

Best answer
3 votes
3 votes
A problem in computer networking called Silly Window Syndrome (SWS) is brought on by shoddy TCP flow control implementation. When the sending application program generates data slowly, the receiving application program consumes data slowly, or both, a significant issue might occur in the sliding window operation. If a server experiencing this issue cannot process all incoming information, it asks that its clients provide fewer data at once (the window setting on a TCP packet). The window gets smaller and smaller if the server keeps being unable to analyze all incoming data, sometimes to the point where the data communicated is less than the packet header, which makes data transmission incredibly wasteful. The fact that the window size shrank to a "silly" value gave rise to the problem's name.

Since processing each packet incurs some overhead, processing a decreasing amount of data requires processing an increasing number of packets. Thrashing is the outcome.
selected by

Related questions

83
views
1 answers
0 votes
Emankashyap asked Jun 9
83 views
Assume a TCP implementation over a 10Gbps link with one way dealy of 80ms if TCP receiver window size is 2MB and TCP send 1KB packet then how many RTT does it take until slow ... no loss of packet.a) 11 RTT b) 10 RTT c) 12 RTT d) 13 RTT
2.6k
views
2 answers
2 votes
Arjun asked Feb 16
2,565 views
Consider a $\text{TCP}$ connection operating at a point of time with the congestion window of size $12$ $\text{MSS}$ (Maximum Segment Size), when a timeout occurs ... window size (in $MSS$) during the third $\text{RTT}$ will be __________.
2.3k
views
1 answers
4 votes
Arjun asked Feb 16
2,326 views
$\mathrm{TCP}$ client $\mathrm{P}$ successfully establishes a connection to $\text{TCP}$ server $\mathrm{Q}$. Let $\text{N}_{P}$ ... The acknowledgement number $\text{N}_{Q}$ is equal to $\text{N}_{P}+1$
528
views
1 answers
4 votes
GO Classes asked Feb 5
528 views
Consider a sliding window protocol with a window size of $5$ using cumulative ACKs (and ACK is being sent for each segment).Assume that the retransmission ... packet 3 was duplicated by the networkACK packet A3 was duplicated by the network