243 views

1 Answer

Best answer
1 votes
1 votes

The minimal cover is typically counted by considering the irreducible dependencies. In this case, the minimal cover is:

  1. A → B
  2. A → C
  3. D → E
  4. D → F

So, in terms of minimal dependencies, you count them as 4 functional dependencies. The original set you provided had redundancy that was eliminated in the minimal cover.

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
1
3 votes
3 votes
1 answer
2
Tuhin Dutta asked Jan 19, 2018
673 views
F: { A- BC, B->C, AC->B }G: { AB->C, A->B, A->C }Does G cover F?
3 votes
3 votes
1 answer
3
pa-try asked Nov 13, 2017
1,462 views
FDs are :A->CAC->DE->ADE->HFind :i) Number of FDs in canonical form.i) Number of FDs in minimal form.
1 votes
1 votes
0 answers
4
set2018 asked Jul 26, 2017
659 views
for the relational scheme R=(A,B,C), and the set F of functional dependenciesA BCB CA BAB Ccompute Fc .